The JW’s bought the Stanley to use as a church, not as a sight-seeing tour. They needed an Assembly Hall and the Stanley was at the right price so they bought it AND restored it.
They are under NO obligation to let other people go in (free) and tour the place. You entered it knowing it had been bought by the JW’s and not some theatrical agency. They dont HAVE to mention anything other than the reason why they bought it.
The fact that it used to be a theatre is not important to anyone but theatre lovers like yourself and, therefore, needn’t be mentioned.
Be thankful that you could see it again when it could easily have been destroyed and stop griping about them not mentioning things that you already know anyway.
I myself, would go just to see the beauty of the place, the architecture. I dont care if it used to be a theatre, an old palace or a brothel; it IS a beautiful place to see and words are not necessary and they wouldnt change the beauty of the place.
Mr. Schmadrian: Your comments ARE biased.
The JW’s bought the Stanley to use as a church, not as a sight-seeing tour. They needed an Assembly Hall and the Stanley was at the right price so they bought it AND restored it.
They are under NO obligation to let other people go in (free) and tour the place. You entered it knowing it had been bought by the JW’s and not some theatrical agency. They dont HAVE to mention anything other than the reason why they bought it.
The fact that it used to be a theatre is not important to anyone but theatre lovers like yourself and, therefore, needn’t be mentioned.
Be thankful that you could see it again when it could easily have been destroyed and stop griping about them not mentioning things that you already know anyway.
I myself, would go just to see the beauty of the place, the architecture. I dont care if it used to be a theatre, an old palace or a brothel; it IS a beautiful place to see and words are not necessary and they wouldnt change the beauty of the place.