True Class,
Thank you so much! I would like to correct one thing. I do not “live in sin with my boyfriend” as Jim Devitt said. I babysit here during the day only.
It’s important that you know that. Thanks again!!
Bye All ;)
Let’s make this easy. Dupesupporter just e-mail me at If you are not Jim Devitt, I will submit apology. If you are, I will provide trackable proof. Go ahead…PLEASE.
DebDynako,
Dupersupporter/dupagedude/JimDevitt will never e-mail you under a paid e-mail account. If he has the testosterone to even respond to your request under even a free account, PLEASE post it here and I will call you to make arrangements for my boyfriend to track it. LET’S EXPOSE THIS PUNK FOR GOOD! My money says he will not e-mail you.
Any IP can be tracked by e-mails. There are footers that can be traced even by e-mails. You do not have to be the site host. I’m telling you, Jim Devitt is the same person that posted on wurfwhile.com under HIS OWN name, on this site under at LEAST two names and on Lombardvillagevoice.com under over 25 names. Here is the link to the post he made on wurfwhile.com. Posting on this blog is what has allowed us to track him: http://www.wurfwhile.com/archives/000613.html
It took us about 5 minutes to track him to his Ameritech account. The same IP address was tracked to literally hundreds of posts as a guest on the lombardvillagevoice site. We were even able to find out his Woodridge address, Il address.
Maybe someone out there will understand that this man is the sperm of the devil.
Just so you all know. Jim Devitt is dupersupporter and dupagedude. My boyfriend is an IS Tech. He was able to track his IP address to several places. Signing off for good. JW.
Ms.Dynako,
A. The silo property was sold to another Condominium developer on June 2nd. I live about 100 yards from that property and we are happy they are gone. I’m not happy about more condo’s and that’s why we hated your plan.
B. I will not apologized to anyone. Why shouyld I? All you people do is try to tell us what’s good for us. The village voted..Enough is enough.
Amazing…Dupersupporter Devitt posts at 6:46 and out of the blue this mystery person he created the Murph pops on the board at 7:00. Do you really think we are that stupid Jim?….Why don’t you come get your shirts.
Rita….You are a very sick woman. You live on the corner of View and Main….Why don’t you come look at that pile of garbage you call a theatre from my front porch. I live right behind it. You Friends think you all know what is best for everyone. You make me sick.
duper supporter and dupage dude and robert r are all the same guy…Jim Devitt. Make no bones about it folks! He won’t post his identity…He is a fraud. “By the way Jimmy, I still have your t-shirts you never picked up!
one way to begin rational, constructive discussion is to keep dupersupporter aka robertr off this board. He goes from website to website antagonizing people that will be impacted by whatever happens on that site. His behavior has caused many who were leaning towards helping to find preservation alternatives into demolitionists. I live immediately behind the theatre and was one of the few that wanted to consider preservation.
One of the gentleman from our block which is behind the theatre had his home vandalized. We are pretty certain it was duper supporter. The gentleman that had his home vandalized was in the process of gather votes from the neighbors about their intersts in an alternate restoration plan. Now he wants to demolish. Can you blame him?
Here is Jim’s most recent bogus e-mail trying to get Challengers info. I honestly do not know Challenger and wouldn’t tell him if I did Jim is a lousy spy:
This message is not flagged. [ Flag Message – Mark as Unread ]
From: “Dan Murphy” <> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
To:
Subject: RE: Takin Back Our Corner
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 12:01:46 -0500
Tell Bruce I’m sorry I haven’t been able to stop over and pick up a
shirt or
two, we had a death in the family and have been quite busy with all the
arrangements and such, it was quite sudden…I do have a question, do
you
know who “Challenger” is, and can you tell me how I could contact him?
I
want to talk to him about some developments I know about the Theatre
property, as well as where the facade and marquee might end up (I have
a
friend on that’s a volunteer at the train museum)? I would greatly
appreciate it!
Here is the full correspondence between Jim and one of the people from the neighborhood:
I am very disappointed with you and whoever is in your group! Here my
wife
and I, who have wrote repeatedly to the village Board as well as local
papers and state politicans, have been in support of the efforts put
forth
for quite a long time, and would like to celebrate with others who have
done
the same things, only to be told because no one recognizes our name
we’re
not invited? How is that fair, I mean, really? I wish your group
would
reconsider sso you can see that Linda and I are not who you think we
are…
Dan
P.S. No, we already paid our sitter, so it’s a done deal…
>From: Jayme Warnock <>
>To: Dan Murphy <>
>Subject: Re:
>Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 22:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
>
>Dan,
>Unfortunately, the Texas BBQ is not the actual site of the party. I
was
>told to respond to you with that location because someone named Jim
deWitt
>has been trying to crash the party and other people from my group
suspect
>you are him. Nobody recognizes your name as someone that worked to
fight
>the RSC plan. I’m so sorry if they are wrong. The party is invite
only.
>I hope you can cancel your sitter:(…..Thanks for inquiring…GO
>LAMP!!!!!!
>
>Dan Murphy <> wrote:
>Linda and I will be there!! Just got a sitter for the kids, so we’re
all
>set. Any hints on who the surprise guests will be? Do we need to check
in
>with anybody when we get there-who should we ask for?
>See ya there!
>Dan
>
>
>
>
> >From: Jayme Warnock
> >To: Dan Murphy
> >Subject: Re: Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >Dan,
> >The celebration is this Saturday at Texas BBQ in their party room.
We are
> >asking for a $15 per person donation to cover the food and beverages
or
>$25
> >per couple. The party starts at 7 pm. We will have a few surprise
guests
> >on hand as well as some neat trivia. Only adults over 21 will be
allowed
> >because of the alcohol. You must RSVP by this Friday.
> >Thanks for supporting “Takin' Back Our Corner"
> >Jayme
> >
> >Dan Murphy wrote:
> >Jayme-Are you really having a party for the demise of the DuPage
Theatre?
> >That’s so cool! I’m glad to read that it’s finally over, now the
Board
>can
> >get down to the real business of running this town instead of all
the
> >sillyness! My wife and I would love to come to the party, I’ll bring
both
> >my neighbor’s signs I talked them into taking down! Let me know the
> >information and if you’d like us to bring anything.
> >
> >Sincerely,
> >Dan Murphy
> >
> >
> >Donâ€\t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
> >http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
> >
> >
> >
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how
to
>get there! View link
>
>
>
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today – it’s
FREE! View link
DeleteReplyForwardSpamMove…
Previous | Next | Back to Messages Save Message Text
Check MailCompose
Here is Jim’s first bogus response to our fake party:
Dan Murphy" <> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
To:
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 17:47:30 -0500
Jayme-Are you really having a party for the demise of the DuPage
Theatre?
That’s so cool! I’m glad to read that it’s finally over, now the Board
can
get down to the real business of running this town instead of all the
sillyness! My wife and I would love to come to the party, I’ll bring
both
my neighbor’s signs I talked them into taking down! Let me know the
information and if you’d like us to bring anything.
The party was a fake setup to draw the ire of Jim DeWitt…There was no party. The artists renderings were taken from websites with permission and used to get the VOL thinking in that direction. Duper Supporter DeWittt fell for the fake party hook, line and sinker. He even sent a bogus e-mail from a hotmail account trying to get invited. We had a good laugh on him….This whole town has had lots of laughs on Jim.
Duper,
Have you lost your mind? They didn’t vote on it in executive session, nor did I say they did. They all received their packets (kits) from the VOL that day, therefore they agreed in EXECUTIVE SESSION to discuss it at the next meeting. How can people collude or collaborate on something they don’t even have info on? Stop being a lockeroom lawyer and harping about things you know nothing about. Duper Supporter has to be the Lombard
Village Idiot Jim DeWitt. Jim is the guy that caused the demise of this theatre. If he had read the instruction properly when he TRIED to run for trustee against Mr. Sebby, he would have won. Instead, he got so caught up in playing with his Caps Lock button he paperclipped his application instead of stapling it. He moved to another community in shame….
Duper,
I was at the meeting and spoke to both 87 Board President Brown board member Voltaggio. They knew why were there and came over to us on the break to tell us they would table their vote until at least the next meeting because they needed more information. This was done in the closed door executive session. The issue was not even on the agenda that evening because the VOL had not sent them their kit until earlier that day. If you want to verify this you can call board president Dave Brown. You can find hi number or e-mail address at www.glenbard.dupage Do your homework before you make accusations Preservationist.
I was at the meeting along with several others concerned with the RSC plan. All I can tell you is that it was in May. The demolition resolution was written the next day and given to the President of the Friends of the DuPage Theatre the day after it was written. The 87 board member Voltaggio made the motion to table the TIF until the June meeting because they did not have enough information.
For the record. Preservationist Jim DeWitt is making posts on a local website under the name of Bill (amongst many other handles). Jim has made claims that he has uncovered thew corruption that has lead to the impending demolition of the DuPage. We can’t wait to read about it in the papers. He alleges that a local theatre/dinner club (the Drury Lane in Oak Brook) payed off the trustees to get rid of the DuPage because it would have been a threat to them. We think it’s a lot of silliness……Let’s see. The web address is www.lombardvillagevoice.com
Ron,
No payola. No back room deals. This is not a small-minded town. You don’t know the whole story. Should we have sat back and taken one for the team financially? As usual, this came down to money plain and simple whether it was decreasing property values for adjacent residents, long-term TIF stranglehold on tax dollars or costly overruns in the restoration plan — As taxpayers, we chose to fight them. Why do you preservationists always assume their is corruption involved when things don’t go your way?
Rita,
Please explain to me how you deternined that Sebby’s district had the “highest amount of support in the village”. I live in district 4. It was the district 4 residents that defeated the RSC plan. Let me tell you how:
Heavy political pressure was put on Senator Cronin to hold off on the TIF extension until the Spring. He complied (Early May 2005)
The failure to get the extension through General Assembly opened the door for the June 2nd resolution to demolish.
Several District 4 residents and community leaders met with 5 of the six trustees individually to garner support for a vote to demolish (All of this ocurred in May) We explained the importance of getting the resolution passed before the Spring. We knew killing the TIF was critical to stopping the RSC Plan. …Remember that?
Once we got the necessary 4 votes to keep the vote away from Mr. Mueller, the resolution was written and passed.
The next step was also important. The TIF probably would have passed in the Spring. We knew that. What we had to do was stop other funding sources that were in the RSC plan. Through our Springfield contacts we discovered that the Governor was going to release a slew of “pork” funds in October 2005. Included in this was the $1 million dollar America First grant. Knowing this, we had to make sure the village voted to reject the funds prior to October. Had this not happened, residents may have warmed up to the RSC plan and supported it. Residents tend to get happy feet about State and Federal support money coming in to their town. The resolution to reject the funds passed and and demolition will happen in either the Fall or the Spring, depending on how the judge rules. There is a contingency plan in case something crazy happens.
That’s the abbreviated version of “How District 4 Residents Defeated a Awful Theatre Plan” It was all done legally and ethically.
So tell me again Rita, how did you come to the conclusion that District 4 had the largest amount of theatre support? There were hundreds of us behind this.
True Class,
Thank you so much! I would like to correct one thing. I do not “live in sin with my boyfriend” as Jim Devitt said. I babysit here during the day only.
It’s important that you know that. Thanks again!!
Bye All ;)
Brian Wolf,
One last comment. You are correct, we could not establish that he was robertr, just dupersupporter and dupagedude….My bad.
Have not received e-mail…Case closed..Per your requests we are done here. Bye:)
Let’s make this easy. Dupesupporter just e-mail me at If you are not Jim Devitt, I will submit apology. If you are, I will provide trackable proof. Go ahead…PLEASE.
?
DebDynako,
Dupersupporter/dupagedude/JimDevitt will never e-mail you under a paid e-mail account. If he has the testosterone to even respond to your request under even a free account, PLEASE post it here and I will call you to make arrangements for my boyfriend to track it. LET’S EXPOSE THIS PUNK FOR GOOD! My money says he will not e-mail you.
Any IP can be tracked by e-mails. There are footers that can be traced even by e-mails. You do not have to be the site host. I’m telling you, Jim Devitt is the same person that posted on wurfwhile.com under HIS OWN name, on this site under at LEAST two names and on Lombardvillagevoice.com under over 25 names. Here is the link to the post he made on wurfwhile.com. Posting on this blog is what has allowed us to track him: http://www.wurfwhile.com/archives/000613.html
It took us about 5 minutes to track him to his Ameritech account. The same IP address was tracked to literally hundreds of posts as a guest on the lombardvillagevoice site. We were even able to find out his Woodridge address, Il address.
Maybe someone out there will understand that this man is the sperm of the devil.
Just so you all know. Jim Devitt is dupersupporter and dupagedude. My boyfriend is an IS Tech. He was able to track his IP address to several places. Signing off for good. JW.
k
Ms.Dynako,
A. The silo property was sold to another Condominium developer on June 2nd. I live about 100 yards from that property and we are happy they are gone. I’m not happy about more condo’s and that’s why we hated your plan.
B. I will not apologized to anyone. Why shouyld I? All you people do is try to tell us what’s good for us. The village voted..Enough is enough.
Amazing…Dupersupporter Devitt posts at 6:46 and out of the blue this mystery person he created the Murph pops on the board at 7:00. Do you really think we are that stupid Jim?….Why don’t you come get your shirts.
Rita….You are a very sick woman. You live on the corner of View and Main….Why don’t you come look at that pile of garbage you call a theatre from my front porch. I live right behind it. You Friends think you all know what is best for everyone. You make me sick.
duper supporter and dupage dude and robert r are all the same guy…Jim Devitt. Make no bones about it folks! He won’t post his identity…He is a fraud. “By the way Jimmy, I still have your t-shirts you never picked up!
one way to begin rational, constructive discussion is to keep dupersupporter aka robertr off this board. He goes from website to website antagonizing people that will be impacted by whatever happens on that site. His behavior has caused many who were leaning towards helping to find preservation alternatives into demolitionists. I live immediately behind the theatre and was one of the few that wanted to consider preservation.
One of the gentleman from our block which is behind the theatre had his home vandalized. We are pretty certain it was duper supporter. The gentleman that had his home vandalized was in the process of gather votes from the neighbors about their intersts in an alternate restoration plan. Now he wants to demolish. Can you blame him?
Here is Jim’s most recent bogus e-mail trying to get Challengers info. I honestly do not know Challenger and wouldn’t tell him if I did Jim is a lousy spy:
This message is not flagged. [ Flag Message – Mark as Unread ]
From: “Dan Murphy” <> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
To:
Subject: RE: Takin Back Our Corner
Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 12:01:46 -0500
Tell Bruce I’m sorry I haven’t been able to stop over and pick up a
shirt or
two, we had a death in the family and have been quite busy with all the
arrangements and such, it was quite sudden…I do have a question, do
you
know who “Challenger” is, and can you tell me how I could contact him?
I
want to talk to him about some developments I know about the Theatre
property, as well as where the facade and marquee might end up (I have
a
friend on that’s a volunteer at the train museum)? I would greatly
appreciate it!
Thanks,
Dan
Here is the full correspondence between Jim and one of the people from the neighborhood:
I am very disappointed with you and whoever is in your group! Here my
wife
and I, who have wrote repeatedly to the village Board as well as local
papers and state politicans, have been in support of the efforts put
forth
for quite a long time, and would like to celebrate with others who have
done
the same things, only to be told because no one recognizes our name
we’re
not invited? How is that fair, I mean, really? I wish your group
would
reconsider sso you can see that Linda and I are not who you think we
are…
Dan
P.S. No, we already paid our sitter, so it’s a done deal…
>From: Jayme Warnock <>
>To: Dan Murphy <>
>Subject: Re:
>Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 22:47:30 -0700 (PDT)
>
>Dan,
>Unfortunately, the Texas BBQ is not the actual site of the party. I
was
>told to respond to you with that location because someone named Jim
deWitt
>has been trying to crash the party and other people from my group
suspect
>you are him. Nobody recognizes your name as someone that worked to
fight
>the RSC plan. I’m so sorry if they are wrong. The party is invite
only.
>I hope you can cancel your sitter:(…..Thanks for inquiring…GO
>LAMP!!!!!!
>
>Dan Murphy <> wrote:
>Linda and I will be there!! Just got a sitter for the kids, so we’re
all
>set. Any hints on who the surprise guests will be? Do we need to check
in
>with anybody when we get there-who should we ask for?
>See ya there!
>Dan
>
>
>
>
> >From: Jayme Warnock
> >To: Dan Murphy
> >Subject: Re: Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 16:38:38 -0700 (PDT)
> >
> >Dan,
> >The celebration is this Saturday at Texas BBQ in their party room.
We are
> >asking for a $15 per person donation to cover the food and beverages
or
>$25
> >per couple. The party starts at 7 pm. We will have a few surprise
guests
> >on hand as well as some neat trivia. Only adults over 21 will be
allowed
> >because of the alcohol. You must RSVP by this Friday.
> >Thanks for supporting “Takin' Back Our Corner"
> >Jayme
> >
> >Dan Murphy wrote:
> >Jayme-Are you really having a party for the demise of the DuPage
Theatre?
> >That’s so cool! I’m glad to read that it’s finally over, now the
Board
>can
> >get down to the real business of running this town instead of all
the
> >sillyness! My wife and I would love to come to the party, I’ll bring
both
> >my neighbor’s signs I talked them into taking down! Let me know the
> >information and if you’d like us to bring anything.
> >
> >Sincerely,
> >Dan Murphy
> >
> >
> >Donâ€\t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search!
> >http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/
> >
> >
> >
> >Do You Yahoo!?
> >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
> >http://mail.yahoo.com
>
>
>On the road to retirement? Check out MSN Life Events for advice on how
to
>get there! View link
>
>
>
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
>http://mail.yahoo.com
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today – it’s
FREE!
View link
DeleteReplyForwardSpamMove…
Previous | Next | Back to Messages Save Message Text
Check MailCompose
Here is Jim’s first bogus response to our fake party:
Dan Murphy" <> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert
To:
Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 17:47:30 -0500
Jayme-Are you really having a party for the demise of the DuPage
Theatre?
That’s so cool! I’m glad to read that it’s finally over, now the Board
can
get down to the real business of running this town instead of all the
sillyness! My wife and I would love to come to the party, I’ll bring
both
my neighbor’s signs I talked them into taking down! Let me know the
information and if you’d like us to bring anything.
Sincerely,
Dan Murphy
The party was a fake setup to draw the ire of Jim DeWitt…There was no party. The artists renderings were taken from websites with permission and used to get the VOL thinking in that direction. Duper Supporter DeWittt fell for the fake party hook, line and sinker. He even sent a bogus e-mail from a hotmail account trying to get invited. We had a good laugh on him….This whole town has had lots of laughs on Jim.
Duper,
Have you lost your mind? They didn’t vote on it in executive session, nor did I say they did. They all received their packets (kits) from the VOL that day, therefore they agreed in EXECUTIVE SESSION to discuss it at the next meeting. How can people collude or collaborate on something they don’t even have info on? Stop being a lockeroom lawyer and harping about things you know nothing about. Duper Supporter has to be the Lombard
Village Idiot Jim DeWitt. Jim is the guy that caused the demise of this theatre. If he had read the instruction properly when he TRIED to run for trustee against Mr. Sebby, he would have won. Instead, he got so caught up in playing with his Caps Lock button he paperclipped his application instead of stapling it. He moved to another community in shame….
Here is the proper URL for District 87 board info.
View link
Duper,
I was at the meeting and spoke to both 87 Board President Brown board member Voltaggio. They knew why were there and came over to us on the break to tell us they would table their vote until at least the next meeting because they needed more information. This was done in the closed door executive session. The issue was not even on the agenda that evening because the VOL had not sent them their kit until earlier that day. If you want to verify this you can call board president Dave Brown. You can find hi number or e-mail address at www.glenbard.dupage Do your homework before you make accusations Preservationist.
Jim DimWitt is not a Preservationist. He works at a 7-11 in Woodridge (he wears the smock with pride). Just something we needed to clear up.
I was at the meeting along with several others concerned with the RSC plan. All I can tell you is that it was in May. The demolition resolution was written the next day and given to the President of the Friends of the DuPage Theatre the day after it was written. The 87 board member Voltaggio made the motion to table the TIF until the June meeting because they did not have enough information.
For the record. Preservationist Jim DeWitt is making posts on a local website under the name of Bill (amongst many other handles). Jim has made claims that he has uncovered thew corruption that has lead to the impending demolition of the DuPage. We can’t wait to read about it in the papers. He alleges that a local theatre/dinner club (the Drury Lane in Oak Brook) payed off the trustees to get rid of the DuPage because it would have been a threat to them. We think it’s a lot of silliness……Let’s see. The web address is www.lombardvillagevoice.com
Ron,
No payola. No back room deals. This is not a small-minded town. You don’t know the whole story. Should we have sat back and taken one for the team financially? As usual, this came down to money plain and simple whether it was decreasing property values for adjacent residents, long-term TIF stranglehold on tax dollars or costly overruns in the restoration plan — As taxpayers, we chose to fight them. Why do you preservationists always assume their is corruption involved when things don’t go your way?
Rita,
Please explain to me how you deternined that Sebby’s district had the “highest amount of support in the village”. I live in district 4. It was the district 4 residents that defeated the RSC plan. Let me tell you how:
Heavy political pressure was put on Senator Cronin to hold off on the TIF extension until the Spring. He complied (Early May 2005)
The failure to get the extension through General Assembly opened the door for the June 2nd resolution to demolish.
Several District 4 residents and community leaders met with 5 of the six trustees individually to garner support for a vote to demolish (All of this ocurred in May) We explained the importance of getting the resolution passed before the Spring. We knew killing the TIF was critical to stopping the RSC Plan. …Remember that?
Once we got the necessary 4 votes to keep the vote away from Mr. Mueller, the resolution was written and passed.
The next step was also important. The TIF probably would have passed in the Spring. We knew that. What we had to do was stop other funding sources that were in the RSC plan. Through our Springfield contacts we discovered that the Governor was going to release a slew of “pork” funds in October 2005. Included in this was the $1 million dollar America First grant. Knowing this, we had to make sure the village voted to reject the funds prior to October. Had this not happened, residents may have warmed up to the RSC plan and supported it. Residents tend to get happy feet about State and Federal support money coming in to their town. The resolution to reject the funds passed and and demolition will happen in either the Fall or the Spring, depending on how the judge rules. There is a contingency plan in case something crazy happens.
That’s the abbreviated version of “How District 4 Residents Defeated a Awful Theatre Plan” It was all done legally and ethically.
So tell me again Rita, how did you come to the conclusion that District 4 had the largest amount of theatre support? There were hundreds of us behind this.