RKO Keith's Theatre

135-35 Northern Boulevard,
Flushing, NY 11354

Unfavorite 51 people favorited this theater

Showing 751 - 775 of 1,324 comments

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on September 19, 2007 at 11:38 am

There were definite back-room deals made between Huang and Manes, bobosan. I remember reading about them in the papers or seeing reportson the news about the implication of Manes' involvement in the Board of Estimate reversal on the landmark designation.

bobosan
bobosan on September 19, 2007 at 3:00 am

I just scrolled through some of the earlier postings and discovered that this connection has already been discussed as follows:

View link

I wonder, though, if an investigation was ever made into whether an illegal deal was made by Huang and Manes? It seems a natural thing to investigate by a District Attorney, doesn’t it?

bobosan
bobosan on September 19, 2007 at 2:52 am

Now that the NY Times allows you to search their archives for free going back to 1981, I found these interesting paragraph about the RKO Keith’s in a 1990 story:

‘In 1984, the Landmarks Preservation Commission designated the interior, calling it ’‘one of the few surviving examples … of the movie palace.’'

But the Board of Estimate eliminated the triplex auditorium from the designation and only the ticket lobby and Grand Foyer were protected.

The Board of Estimate no longer exists in New York City. It was the real political power in the city for decades, much more important than the City Council. It was abolished, I believe sometime in the 1980s, by the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled that it violated the one-man, one-vote principle.

If my memory serves, the Board of Estimate was made up of the Mayor, City Controller, and Borough Presidents. For the Board of Estimate to have struck down the landmarks designation for th

e RKO’s interior, it seems certain that the Borough President of Queens must have taken action. After all, who else on the Board would have cared?

The Borough President of Queens in 1984 was Donald Manes, a notorious crook who later killed himself when his corruption was revealed. Has all this ever been investigated? Is it likely that Manes killed the landmark designation in return for some payoff? And if so, who made the payoff? It’s all very fascinating, no?

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on September 8, 2007 at 4:28 pm

Thanks for the nice comments, guys. I must thank SWCphotography for inspiring me to go back and capture more detail – based on the shots he posted recently. I have seen your photos before, bobosan. It did indeed close at the end of the summer in 1986.

bobosan
bobosan on September 7, 2007 at 10:18 pm

Nice job, Ed. I hadn’t seen those details in such close-up before. It all helps document this great building before it disappears.

To help recall the changing face of the closed building, you might want to look at my pics, taken in 1990 and 94. The theater closed in ‘86, I believe.

http://bobby19850.tripod.com/

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on September 7, 2007 at 10:03 pm

Thanks, Ed, for all of those — especially the close-up details. If nothing else, this has to be one of the best documented exteriors (such as it is) ever.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on September 7, 2007 at 9:19 pm

PKoch… I was at the theater just the other day and all looks status quo. It seems that the property is once again stuck in a political and economic quagmire. Last year, the developer submitted revised plans that were rejected by the community board and the prevailing thought is that they are looking to abandon plans and ditch the site due to the softening real estate market. At least that puts off the horrific “glass curtain” proposal for the site – however, if the theater is allowed to rot too much longer, all hope of a restoration of any kind (landmarked areas or otherwise) might be lost. At some point, some politician will have had enough and will push through a plan to level the site just to rid the area of the “eyesore.” Let’s hope it doesn’t come to that.

Meanwhile, I snapped some more photos. Start with this one and – if you have patience for my self-indulgence – continue by clicking “Next” for the other 15 or so new pics.

PKoch
PKoch on September 7, 2007 at 1:14 pm

What’s going on with RKO Keith’s Flushing right now ? Are we still in the “Hang Huang” non-development deadlock ?

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on August 29, 2007 at 11:49 pm

It is ineresting to note that in 1975, when the pre-triplexed RKO was functioning Town Hall looked like this:
View link
Now except for Town Hall Flushing landmarks are in utter disrepair, notably the New York State Pavilion, the Bowne House and the RKO. The distinction being that the RKO has a prime location and is the one enclosed structure big enough to generate revenue. Once Boymelgreen takes the tax write off and divests the RKO there are plenty of theatre restoration precedents. I recently visited Shea’s Theatre, in Buffalo, at about the same size as the RKO, is City owned and maintained by a preservation guild; see:
View link

Mike (saps)
Mike (saps) on August 28, 2007 at 10:02 am

I went here in the late ‘70’s, when it was already triplexed, and saw a movie in the balcony. It was my first atmospheric and I was amazed — it was like seeing a movie in an outside garden at twilight. I’ve never forgotten it.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on August 28, 2007 at 9:23 am

I was in the area yesterday and saw the sign in front of the Keith’s (as well as one in front of Town Hall). I’m happy that someone (or some group) was able to get these markers installed – and not just for the theater, but for the other historic sites that dot this strip along Norhtern Blvd and might otherwise be obscured in the avalanche of Chinese-language signs that seem to fall on top of one another everywhere you look.

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on August 27, 2007 at 7:53 pm

My virus scan shows no problems with this link, but suffice it to say that it does not take much research to see that Boymelgreen has a lot of problems and that the RKO with that confounded landmark status (and now a sign in front proclaming it) is just one more headache (or virus) in the imploding condo conversion scheme. Why not build condos over the Bowne house instead? They could save the front door and there is plenty of parking. Already there is what appears to be barracks/condos under construction in the courtyard of the vintage apartments right next door! (you have to see this to believe it).

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on August 27, 2007 at 10:46 am

Like anything associated with Boymelgreen, that last page seems to have contained a virus!

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on August 27, 2007 at 8:44 am

The sign in the foreground is 1 of 21 markers placed next to landmark sites around Flushing, by the Queens Historical Society, as part of the “Flushing Freedom Mile”. These signs were put up within the last year and serve to call attention to this buildings state of neglect. All these photos have the option to view an enlarged version and most of the text can be made out:
View link
You can count on Boymelgreen unloading this property as they did with 14 Wall St. and that was before the mortgage loan bust; see: http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/895594.html

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on August 26, 2007 at 6:41 pm

Those ‘73 shots are from a bygone era, SWC. The Keith’s was still in operation as a single-screener, Shea Stadium still had its original concrete beige color (remember those blue and orange pastel shingles on the rampways?), and all the signage is in English! Thanks for sharing.

In one of your more recent photos, it looks as if there’s some sort of rather expensive-looking marker in front of the building pointing out the former theater’s historic significance. When was this taken? Is this something that is there now?

SWCphotography
SWCphotography on August 26, 2007 at 6:18 pm

I visited my old home town at the end of June and managed to get a few nice exterior shots, getting a bit closer to the faded “FINEST THEATRE ON THE NORTH SHORE” than what I have seen on line. Be aware that these are high resolution photos and you can count the bricks.
View link
View link
View link
View link
The RKO in relation to the Northern Blvd. scene from the Fall of 1973:
View link
View link
View link
Also: This mural appeared on the South side of the LIRR Main Street overpass. Toward the top you can see the RKO Keiths depicted. Like the theatre itself this mural was in bad shape when I took this photo in July 2001. It is now completely covered with street vendor displays, who knows this might help to preserve what’s left of it:
View link

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on August 26, 2007 at 12:48 pm

Consider the absurdity fully justified, Jeffrey:

Butterfly 3/10/82

And now – thankfully – we can put this baby to bed!

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on August 26, 2007 at 12:38 pm

I completely blanked out on the Pia Zadora connection. Now we just have to determine if any films with Ms. Zadora in them played at the Keith’s, and the circle, if not complete, will at least justify taking this absurd thread!

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on August 26, 2007 at 11:57 am

True, bobosan… But the fringe benefits of being with the lovely (if talentless) Miss Zadora might have been well worth the investment for Riklis!

bobosan
bobosan on August 26, 2007 at 10:17 am

You guys are missing the real story here…Meshulam Riklis became famous when he married Pia Zadora and tried to make her into a movie star. That investment didn’t pan out either.

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on August 26, 2007 at 9:09 am

Aha! My memory was sort of accurate, but I combined some things. According to an April 5, 1968 TIME article, “Wall Street whiz-bang Meshulam Riklis” at the time was attempting to “take over Schenley Industries, Inc., one of the nation’s biggest distillers (1967 sales: $518 million), through a merger with Glen Alden Corp., part of the $1.4 billion sales complex that Riklis, 44, has shuffled together.”

“Should it succeed, the Schenley takeover would cap a comeback for Riklis, a Palestinian immigrant whose seesawing fortunes have fascinated observers on Wall Street for years. Riklis came to the U.S. in 1947, taught Hebrew and sold stock in Minneapolis until the mid-1950s, when he was struck with what he now calls "the effective nonuse of cash"â€"or the technique of using borrowed money to buy undervalued companies, whose assets could provide the leverage for still larger takeovers.

Backed initially by a group of Minneapolis investors, in less than a decade Riklis spun together a retailing empire under the Rapid-American Corp., which controlled McCrory Corp. whose 1,500 stores (McCrory-McLellan-Green, National Shirt, Lerner) racked up $554 million in sales in 1962. By then he was vastly overextended. When grandly predicted earnings failed to materialize, McCrory’s stock tumbled and Riklis' entire colossus seemed headed for collapse. “God,” wailed Riklis at one point, “has added to our agonies.”

Scrambling for survival capital, Riklis sold off Rapid-American’s businesses (paint, printing and clothing), leaving it a mere shell. McCrory, too, came in for a paring. Riklis then bought control of Glen Alden Corp., a conglomerate with interests in coal and leather goods (which he sold) and textiles and R.K.O. theaters (which he retained). By 1965, such shufflings yielded some $50 million, which Riklis soon put to work. Since early 1966, Glen Alden has bought into building materials, B.V.D. clothing, and only three months ago, the diversified Stanley Warner Corp., whose interests include Playtex bras, movie theaters and throat lozenges."

How ironic! Sounds like the RKO Keith’s went from the frying pan (Riklis) to the fire (Boymelgren).

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on August 26, 2007 at 8:52 am

Glen Alden Corporation? Wow, haven’t heard that name in a while…now I’m racking my brain, trying to remember why I know them. They were one of those conglomerates that sprung up in the 60s, buying a lot of seemingly incompatible businesses. I seem to recall they wound up owning Korvettes or some other discount retailer, but I’m not sure.

Panzer65
Panzer65 on August 25, 2007 at 10:09 am

I hope you win!
Paging Donald Trump!!

trapdoor
trapdoor on July 29, 2007 at 10:48 pm

The story of the Keiths is an ongoing saga, now approaching its 21st year since shutting its doors. I havent heard much news about the theater since late last year. My gut tells me that with the real estate market slowing down, he is probably going to unload the property at some point. There is just alot less money to be made now than when he purchased it a few years ago. Lets face it folks this is downtown Flushing, its not Manhattan, where real estate is defying every trend. In terms of the renderings, take them with a grain of salt. Buildings often dont even remotely resemble the original renderings when their finished. Those renderings havent been updated in a long time and dont account for the considerable downsizing he had to provide to satisfy the community board and get approval. The lobby will be preserved and open to the public as a general lobby. This was worked out a long time ago. The hopes of Rko Keiths becoming a fully functioning theater again are slim to none. Unless you have a friend who has an extra 10-30 million lying around for restoration. Most people dont. I often dreamed, if I ever hit the 300 million dollar lottery, my first act would be to pay my bills and my second act would be to set aside 30 million for the Keiths. A nice dream, but just a dream.

Jeffrey1955
Jeffrey1955 on July 27, 2007 at 5:00 pm

With the number of posts on this page over the past 6+ years, it’s no wonder things have become so repetitive — who can keep track? But I’m sure we’ve had links to those Boymelgreen renderings before. Note that their description of the project says it will be completed in early 2008 — highly unlikely if they haven’t even started. Whatever happened to the rumors that Boymelgreen was trying to unload the property? Has anybody heard anything new? Is there anything at all going on there? News and speculation about this theater seems to have died since that flurry of activity in December and January.