Loew's Victoria Theatre

233 W. 125th Street,
New York, NY 10027

Unfavorite 5 people favorited this theater

Showing 51 - 75 of 87 comments

mp775
mp775 on April 16, 2008 at 7:32 am

Article in today’s AM New York. The Danforth tower plan involves further cutting up the interior space and making two small theaters; the community would like to see the theater restored.

stevebob
stevebob on March 29, 2008 at 7:36 pm

I just noticed “Style: Unknown” in the description. Shouldn’t it be Adam?

soothsayer
soothsayer on March 9, 2008 at 10:52 am

here are some interior photos of this theater
http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/hhh.ny0781

it includes some information on the architect, date, who built it, the suppliers of the building materials, etc.

KingBiscuits
KingBiscuits on February 7, 2008 at 9:02 pm

Two words.

Later on, it went back to the old name but with a slight change, as the Harlem Victoria (found this through New York Times microfilm).

Luis Vazquez
Luis Vazquez on July 31, 2007 at 8:22 am

Update on the Victoria Theater’s redevelopment plans. This excerpt comes from the July 26th 2007 edition of The New York Sun about all of the development projects underway in Harlem;

“Real estate and community leaders expect the Empire State Development Corporation and its subsidiary, the Harlem Community Development Corporation, to finally select a developer for the Victoria Theater site on West 125th Street. As reported in The New York Sun last month, the Jazz Museum in Harlem is part of a bid by Danforth Development Partners to renovate the Victoria Theater. The Jazz Museum would get between 10,000 and 20,000 square feet of exhibition space. The buildings would include two theaters to be used by the Classical Theater of Harlem, the Bill T. Jones & Arnie Zane Dance Company, and the Harlem School of Arts.”

This is great news as it appears that the theater will in fact be restored and will once again become a performing arts space. This is wonderful for Harlem and the City of New York.

Luis Vazquez
Luis Vazquez on December 17, 2006 at 6:29 am

I don’t believe there’s been any movement on this project since the last post. Should we expect change of direction now that Spitzer and the Democrats are now in power in Albany?

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on May 8, 2006 at 7:19 am

It wasn’t so long ago that including neighborhoods in the address (or the word “Queens” in Queens addresses) would be problematic with mapping theater addresses above. I guess Google has updated its software to correct this issue. As I said, looks like theaters are slowly but surely being updated on this site so that their addresses include zip codes. I only wish the inclusion of neighborhoods was more consistent here.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on May 8, 2006 at 6:09 am

Warren is correct. That goes for all of NYC except Queens. While including the neighborhood is nice for folks looking to narrow down a search or those interested in a specific geographic locality, it doesn’t help to map the theater at all. Perhaps in some future update of the website, a seperate neighborhood tag can be included for searching purposes. I have noticed that many of the theater updates going on lately have been to include a zip code in the address. Ultimately, searching by zip will probably be the best way of targeting neighborhood theaters in a search.

Nice photo’s, Ken. I took the liberty of clicking through the album for a nice little tour of former theater sites in upper Manhattan.

Ken Roe
Ken Roe on May 7, 2006 at 9:26 am

Two photographs taken in July 2003:
Facade and marquee:
http://flickr.com/photos/kencta/142173254/
Detail in close-up:
http://flickr.com/photos/kencta/142173666/

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on January 18, 2006 at 6:49 am

Thanks Warren. And without a single square inch of the Victoria granted landmark designation, the developers are beholden to no one as to their vision of “preservation.”

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on January 17, 2006 at 10:43 am

I caught the end of an item on the news last night (I think WABC channel 7 here in NYC) about a plan that has been finalized to redevelop the Victoria building. I didn’t catch the details at all, but there will be a building rising above the theater and – while it will not be restored to single screen theatrical use – as much of the architectural elements and detail work will be retained and restored as possible. Not sure if this will prove to be another RKO Keith’s project in the making. I know that they’ve been looking for a developer and taking bids on this site for at least the past year or more. I couldn’t find the story on the net, but I admit I didn’t really search all that hard. I tried the NY Times sight, as well as WABC and WNBC sites. I also Googled a few variations on the topic, but didn’t find anything. Anyone have details on the current plans?

RobertR
RobertR on November 1, 2005 at 1:40 am

This theatre was last known as Movie Center 5 so that should at least be the alternate name.

dave-bronx™
dave-bronx™ on October 31, 2005 at 10:08 pm

lostmemory: – could it be that in 1917 theatres were not specifically designated as motion picture theatres? It probably had a working stage and presented vaudville as well as movies. Modern NYC C of O’s indicate motion picture theatre when there is no stage, fly-loft, scenery, an abundance of draperies and high-voltage stage lighting boards, or performers using candles or cigarettes. The combination of those elements in the past have been the source of many disasterous theatre fires that resulted in large losses of life. A C of O for a motion picture theatre requires less in the way of fire supression equipment and slightly less restrictive regulation by the FDNY.

Ammaat
Ammaat on October 25, 2005 at 5:38 am

The theaters did not do well because the former owners and those who leased it did not conduct business intelligently. They were more for profit and let the theatre go, so the state got a hold of it and here we are.

Warren, thank u for that piece of info, I have been looking for that for a while now. Can u elaborate on where u got it?

Also, it is rumored that the theater is to be sold to the Apollo Group for development. They will destroy the theater and cut it up. Harlem needs this theater to be Landmarked and restored. Please log on the www.haarlemvictoria.com and sign the petition and write to the representives and HCDC. We can’t let them get away with this.

RobertR
RobertR on October 18, 2005 at 5:00 am

Those were pretty good size auditoriums as a five-plex. Anyone know why it did not do well? It closed quite a while before the Magic Johnson opened up.

GeorgeStrum
GeorgeStrum on September 23, 2005 at 2:34 am

An article about Vicotria 5 was featured in this day’s, 9/23/05, Daily News.Plans are being considered to convert the theatre into some combination of hotel or condos with a cultural component. The Victoria was built by the Loews theatre chain as a classical beauty, with a domed ceiling, large murals and a deep balcony. Silent screen star Elsie Ferguson was the guest of honor on opening night in 1917. Irving Berlin and Fatty Arbuckle were also there that night.

Ken Roe
Ken Roe on July 31, 2005 at 12:17 pm

BobT;
The location work done for “The Guru” (2002) UK/France/USA was filmed inside the Thomas Lamb designed Loew’s 175th Street Theatre, Manhattan.

Exterior shots and some scenes in the earlier part of the movie were filmed on location outside and around the RKO Keith’s Richmond Hill, Queens. The marquee was renovated on this theatre by the film production company.

Both theatres are listed on Cinema Treasures.

I love this movie, it’s fun and light hearted and it’s got great shots of the theatres too!

RobertR
RobertR on July 8, 2005 at 2:26 pm

This was still Loew’s Victoria when “Williard” opened
View link

ASTANKH
ASTANKH on April 22, 2005 at 5:57 am

THANK YOU M_ACEVEDO & CHRISTABEL GOUGH for the information

Club Isis/ Haarlem Victoria

Christabel
Christabel on April 21, 2005 at 2:01 pm

An illustrated article about the history of the Victoria with comments by Michael Henry Adams is on line at www.villageviews.org Christabel Gough

MarcoAcevedo
MarcoAcevedo on March 29, 2005 at 2:53 pm

See Stanley Crouch’s column of March 27 in the NY Daily News regarding a proposed interactive Jazz Museum bidding for the use of the Victoria (against several hotel chains…. who, I’m guessing, would be much less likely to preserve the existing strucure in any meaningful way…)

View link

ASTANKH
ASTANKH on February 19, 2005 at 10:11 am

The Haarlem Victoria Restoration Group, Kingsdale LLC was founded by Ethel Bates. Our mission is to get NYC Land Mark Preservation Comm. to designate Loew’s Victoria aka Loew’s 125th Street as a historical land mark. We need your letters of support. Send your letters to
Haarlem Victoria Restoration Group
P. O. Box 462
New York, NY 10027
or contact us by phone: 212-749-7299 or our website
www.haarlemvictoria.com

Movieplace
Movieplace on February 2, 2005 at 8:04 am

I have spoken to the people at council member Bill Perkins office. The councilman is very supportive of historical preservation. He had a piece about landmark preservation in his latest newsletter which I coincidently received yesterday.
I asked the people at Mr. Perkins office if there was anything I could do, being a local business owner (Broadway & 105th street anyway), a member of Cinema Treasures.org, the THSOA as well as being the biggest Thomas W. Lamb fan (I took great umbrage when Jim Rankin refered to “the staid designs of Thomas Lamb”). The woman I spoke to was very receptive. We both agreed that Harlem has lost too many of it’s theatres and New York City has lost too much of Thomas Lamb’s work.
Maybe something can come of Mr. Perkins involvement.
Ms.Pogrebin is a customer of mine and our daughters are friends. She might be a help to this cause as well.

Ammaat
Ammaat on February 2, 2005 at 5:19 am

I pass by this theatre practically everyday and it looks like a porno spot. This article indicated that the seven proposers only want to preserve the facade. The theatre is not only the facade, craftsmanship of this kind should be preserved. In their own (ESDC)correspondence they indicate that it is eligible for landmark status (nylovesbiz.com), but no one is pushing for it. Developers tend to stay away from landmark buildings thus you have D. Phillpotts saying that preservation is all fine and good but money is the bottom line. For who? I don’t see any community involvement or consideration for the neighborhood and the structure that they want to place on top does not blend in with the facade or the neighborhood. There is no respect for the History in Harlem only lip service. The community needs to speak out against these proposals and demand landmark status as there a few in Harlem.