LaGrange Theatre

80 S. La Grange Road,
La Grange, IL 60525

Unfavorite 16 people favorited this theater

Showing 26 - 50 of 91 comments

Bischof
Bischof on May 26, 2009 at 12:29 am

Funny, the ‘1983’ photo above features my aunt in the box office, and my grandfather in the suitcoat at the front door.

Bischof
Bischof on May 26, 2009 at 12:05 am

Of course, we could not have expected this to happen without a little corruption…

View link

kencmcintyre
kencmcintyre on March 1, 2009 at 3:42 pm

Renovation is discussed in this 2/11/09 article:
http://tinyurl.com/arsejx

spectrum
spectrum on November 12, 2008 at 2:39 pm

According to this article (http://cinematreasures.org/news/20189_0_1_0_M/),
the La Grange is now owned by David Rizner and John Rot, who have just received $1,000,000 from the city (through the tax increment financing system) for infrastructure repairs, including plumbing and electrical, and will use $650,000 of their own money for interior and business upgrades. In addition, the La Grange Business Association has pledged $50,000 to build a replica of the original marquee.

The above links to a Chicago Tribune article which also says the theatre was constructed in 1925 and the architects were Rapp & Rapp.

BigTomEH
BigTomEH on October 27, 2008 at 7:51 am

Let’s all play Lotto…

Anyone ever see the LaGrange/LaGrange Park edition of the ‘Images of America’ series? They’re wonderful books—I’m sure that edition is available at the Borders down the street. Flip to the page that features the original LaGrange Theatre lobby as a movie palace; it’s so ornate!

Don’t bank on Classic Cinemas buying it…they just reopened the North Riverside Mall theater, and they were forced to drop out of a planned 11-screener as part of Tinley Park’s urban renewal. Needless to say, the economy has not been kind to the entertainment industry. ‘The Dark Knight’ really saved Hollywood this year.

Bischof
Bischof on October 21, 2008 at 11:45 pm

Yeah, it’s pretty sad…

The place is far from an abortion, but certainly when you consider what has been done to it, facade irreversibly painted over, perfectly good irreplacable trimwork torn out… essentially an incomplete shell of a building that hasn’t seen added work in almost a year now, it really is depressing.

I think about the flack I used to give my grandfather, “Why don’t you replace this”, “why don’t you change that”– the problem was, LaGrange ALWAYS gave my family flack about repairing the building, so anything done to it was patchwork. If you wanted to tear a wall out and expand an area, they wanted you to replace irrelavent electric in the other side of the building. Absurd, and now that Hortons has proven incapable of forming a sound business plan for the organization, the village wants nothing to do with it, and having jumped the gun, Hortons is finding themselves “stuck” with a partially destroyed building. Stupidity.

It’s pathetic really, I have such passion for that building; I want so very much to see the building improved, restored, and preserved… $3M of work, and you’d have one HELL of a theatre! Yeah, in this economy, I’m sure banks will be lining up around the corner!

CinemarkFan
CinemarkFan on October 21, 2008 at 11:35 pm

If I can get the capital, I’d like to buy it. I’m in the process of trying to get my theater corp off the ground by next summer.

Don’t worry, I’m writing a business plan. No Village-like operation will come from me.

CatherineDiMartino
CatherineDiMartino on October 21, 2008 at 10:50 pm

I went here with my husband to see “Tropic Thunder”, which was playing in theatre #3. The others on this site are correct. The renovations are very tacky. The above person who said “the former wooden beltline below the wall curtains having been raised to approximately 6' with what appears to be a florecent backlighting over the murals.” is absolutely correct.

Having the curtains at a hieght of over 6' is detrimental in many ways:

1) Your eye now gravitates upwards.
2) The glare from the screen bounces off these murals. Having the belt rail closer to the floor used to give the place a more pleasing subdued tone.
3) The sound now bounces off the walls. Again, having the curtains lower was acoustically beneficial because they absorbed the sound better.

They would have been better off cleaning and repairing the place. The curtains should have remained as they were, either cleaned or replaced, but at the same level.

This is really a shame because I like this theatre. The staff is very friendly, the prices are good and the LaGrange books good 2nd run films. I’ve even seen “Letters From Iwo JIma” and “The Counterfeiters” here. I’ll probably still patronize the place, but I wish someone like Classic Cinemas would take it over.

corvetteguy1963
corvetteguy1963 on July 20, 2008 at 1:11 am

I went there today to see Zohan.I have not been there in a year or so,and was wondering when the mercy killing of this theatre will happen? Whomever is running it is driving it off a cliff,they cannot do a better job if they tried! What a sticky floored,busted seat,overflowed toilet,haphazardly painted,torn up theatre! The Granada when it was in the process of being TORN DOWN ,was in better shape than this dive.This degradation has happened quickly and recently! WAY TO GO!!!

BigTomEH
BigTomEH on May 17, 2008 at 10:45 am

It may have cost me my job there, but this is exactly what I was trying to get across to the owners the whole time. Not only do they not know—or, seemingly, care—what they’re doing, they wouldn’t even listen to the suggestions of someone who spent 5 years in the industry. Scott, you’re not overreacting. That theater was doomed the day Horton’s obtained it. I say it’s time to give the Johnson family a call and have Classic Cinemas buy the theatre and restore it the right way (ironically, most people think the LaGrange is part of the Classic Cinemas family anyway).

Broan
Broan on May 5, 2008 at 1:10 am

Actually LHAT would probably be a more appropriate organization, although THSA would probably be able to refer them to local resources.

PhatFSJ
PhatFSJ on May 4, 2008 at 8:32 pm

…they need to step in to offer their guidance and assistance. The Hortons people are clearly in over their heads, they can’t even form a long-term business plan with which to obtain additional funding from the village of LaGrange for continued restoration. Come to think of it, considering what’s been done, maybe that’s a good thing.

My point is, they need someone with the right head about them, someone with the right experience, managing this project of theirs.

PhatFSJ
PhatFSJ on May 4, 2008 at 6:25 pm

It IS distressing.

Theater 2, not so much. It’s being used as a “multimedia” theater, with a stage, directional lighting, and an overhead projector. Their plan is to use it for community functions and stage plays. Good idea, seems to function pretty well for that use. If they did nothing more with this theater, they’d be making a great decision.

Theaters 3 and 4 are the ones I’d call defaced, to similarly quote several others who have also seen the work. There are crude murals on the walls, with the former wooden beltline below the wall curtains having been raised to approximately 6' with what appears to be a florecent backlighting over the murals. Looks rushed, sloppy, and haphazard. Theater 3 has an American flag Uncle Sam theme that’s delightfully random and pointless, with theater 4 sporting a similar tangent. Clean what was there, replace the seats, and that should have been it. Money would have been better spent restoring to something relevant and worthy of this historic structure rather than the current byproduct, something better suited for the walls of an elementary school.

The lobby is an abortion, an even bigger shame. Whoever is in charge of this thing hasn’t a clue what they’re doing and should really concentrate their efforts elsewhere. The THSA needs to step in somewhere.

By the time they’re done there won’t be anything left to landmark.

Broan
Broan on May 4, 2008 at 1:37 pm

That sounds distressing. What do you mean by defaced? Where are the murals?

PhatFSJ
PhatFSJ on May 4, 2008 at 12:40 pm

I am extremely disappointed with what has been done to the theater.

The new seats are great, however, theaters 2-4 have been defaced, there’s no other way to put it. The classic look and feel of the former facade, however dirty and in need of cleaning, have instead been degraded with “murals” that are loud, shoddy, and irrelevant. If money to repair and improve the theater is in short supply, why was it spent on things like this?

The work being done in the lobby is unspeakable. It’s so… yellow. 80s track lighting, concrete painted over, painted plywood, wiremolding…

Does Hortons have a business plan? Their most recent meeting with the LaGrange Board says… NO. They really need to hire someone who specializes in rehabbing and restoring old theater structures. Until then, there’s a lot of money being wasted, and what little history is left behind, destroyed. Someone needs to step up and set things straight.

Scott
Scott on April 26, 2008 at 9:08 am

It must have been tough on the residents of LaGrange when the price went from $1.75 to $2.00 in 1998.

Bischof
Bischof on April 26, 2008 at 8:36 am

I may warrant noting that the statement regarding when ticket pries last went up is totally incorrect.

From 1983 to 1998, ticket prices were “As Always, Only $1.75”.

In Mid-1998, prices were increased to $2.

Paul Fortini
Paul Fortini on April 24, 2008 at 10:10 am

The La Grange will be raising it’s admission prices to $3.50 to help cover the costs of renovations. I wonder if that will affect the attendance at this second run house.

From the theatre’s website:

‘Remember When…

The Blues Brothers were on a “Mission from God"
"ET Phone home” made you cry
You were shocked that Vader was Luke’s Father

These were playing the last time La Grange Theatre raised ticket prices! Starting April 2nd, we will be raising our ticket price to $3.50, to help in the continued renovation of our theatres.'

Please continue to patronize this theatre everybody. The owners are making an earnest attempt to stay in business.

Paul Fortini
Paul Fortini on February 12, 2008 at 9:06 am

Robin,

It was nice meeting you the other night. I hope that I don’t sound patronizing, but I am glad that you go out and enjoy movies too. And yes, “Letters From Iwo Jima” is a fantastic film.

RobinW
RobinW on February 11, 2008 at 11:48 pm

I was at this theatre only once, and that was to see “Letters From Iwo Jima”. As I pointed out on the page for the Music Box, I’m deaf but I enjoy watching movies just as much as everybody else does. I also enjoy going to the movies, but I’m limited to films with subtitles. So when this film was showing, my husband and I went out here to see it. Incidentally, it was one of the few theatres in Chicagoland that showed it.

Unfortunately, what we didn’t realize was that the first several minutes of the film are in English, with no subtitles! So my husband, who is a “hearing person” tried “signing” for me so I could follow it (I can talk and lip-read, but I mainly use American Sign Language)! No matter, the rest of the movie is in Japanese with English subtitles (whew!) and quite frankly, it is one of the best movies I have ever seen.

The theatre seems a little run-down, but it looks like they are trying to do renovations. Unfortunately, we were in one of the un-renovated auditoriums! The seats are at a weird angle to the screen and they are very unforgiving. My rear-end was sore after almost three hours of sitting there, but it was a fine film. The people that work there seem very pleasant too!

If you haven’t seen “Letters From Iwo Jima”, rent it or buy it! It is great. We bought the DVD about a week after we saw it in the theatre. I was able to put the closed-captioning on so that I could better understand the English part.

GaryRickert
GaryRickert on February 1, 2008 at 12:19 pm

OK, so I assume that with Tom gone either no one knows who is now “in charge” or no one cares, the place is closed or…

GaryRickert
GaryRickert on January 14, 2008 at 3:11 pm

OK, so who is in charge now?

Bischof
Bischof on January 14, 2008 at 2:35 pm

Tom is no more…

GaryRickert
GaryRickert on January 14, 2008 at 2:13 pm

Tom, how about a report on the progress of the renovation? Will there be an open house?
Gary