Embassy 1,2,3 Theatre

707 7th Avenue,
New York, NY 10036

Unfavorite 39 people favorited this theater

Showing 376 - 400 of 1,094 comments

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on August 11, 2011 at 8:24 am

Excellent point, Al. Doesn’t make me feel any better about it. But should I expect anything less from policital entities like the local CB’s and the LPC than that they shirk their responsibilities and/or ignore their charters only to satisfy the needs of a few wealthy real estate developers? Throw into that mix a few corrupt and powerful elected officals and the doom of these beloved strucutres has been more or less sealed.

techman707
techman707 on August 11, 2011 at 8:22 am

At least they kept one “iffy” area theatre in LA. They didn’t close the Chinese Theatre (despite the different owners over the years). I remember in the late 60’s and early 70’s when Hollywood Blvd. wasn’t the greatest place to be. Theatre like the Warner and Pantages sat closed because all the “action” was at places like Westwood Village, etc. But, they didn’t demolish EVERYTHING, which is why those theatres still exist to be used today. Even the Cinerama Dome wasn’t destroyed when they ADDED extra theatres. But here in NY….NOTHING!

Al Alvarez
Al Alvarez on August 11, 2011 at 7:52 am

I think the issue is property values and not just that LA was more conscientious of its architectural legacy than NY. Times Square, even at its nadir was valuable space. For example, the Beacon, a failure from day one, was spared because the neighborhood became ‘iffy’ for several decades. The same for Loews Kings and other borough palaces.

Hollywood Boulevard was not consistently the center of entertainment the way Times Square has been. Our NY theatre were victims of the success surrounding them.

techman707
techman707 on August 11, 2011 at 6:54 am

“….more cinema treasures out there are allowed to prosper in their original purpose. I’m a bit jealous of that.”

It doesn’t bode well for New York that all the movie palaces have either been butchered or demolished. I believe that in the end it’s going to finally destroy movie theatres as a viable business in general. Right now, if the film companies had their way, they would stream the movies directly to you house, bypassing theatrical exhibition altogether.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on August 11, 2011 at 5:32 am

Ok, so maybe I had young Mr Radcliffe in mind when I wrote that, but more generally speaking, more and more Broadway productions have resorted to gimmicky celebrity casting (with varying degrees of success – both financial and critical) to put more fannies in the seats – and extort higher prices while doing so. In any event, NY is about the cash-cow of legit theater. I’m sure LA is all about the money, too, but on that coast the money comes from Hollywood and more cinema treasures out there are allowed to prosper in their original purpose. I’m a bit jealous of that.

techman707
techman707 on August 10, 2011 at 9:01 pm

Oh, and Ed, the Broadway MOVIE theatres saw a tourist or two in days gone by. Like you said, screwing people for $200 and up to see a live play just ISN’T in the “average” persons agenda. We leave those things to people like The Bloomer Mayor and other people of his ilk.

techman707
techman707 on August 10, 2011 at 8:56 pm

Little Potter is okay in “How To Succeed”, BUT, if you REALLY want to see the part played RIGHT, SEE ROBERT MORSE in the FILM! The film version was great….but didn’t do as well as it should have. (the MGM DVD transfer isn’t too good either, but, maybe they’ll come out with a Blu-ray some day).

Al Alvarez
Al Alvarez on August 10, 2011 at 8:12 pm

Agreed, but leave Harry Potter alone. That boy just wants to dance and sing!

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on August 10, 2011 at 7:54 pm

Hey, Al… You are correct. I guess we can say the Criterion was the last of the big roadshow houses to close on Times Square proper, but the good ole Playpen outlasted the rest of the neighborhood cinemas by a good country mile!

Saps… you gave me a good chuckle with that poem, thanks! And I couldn’t agree more with tech man and Astyanax about the criminal destruction of the Roxy. Add the Capitol, Rivoli and Loew’s State to that mix. As I’ve said many times before on this site, NYC doesn’t give a damn about its rich and significant heritage in the world of cinematic exhibition. When it comes to landmarking and protecting theaters, it’s all about the Benjamins…. with a capital B that rhymes with T that stands for TOURISM!!

“Broadway” is legitimate theatre, where people come from out of town to get shellacked at the box office to the tune of about $250 for a pair of ducats to see the latest Hollywood star take his ill-advised turn at yet another musical-comedy revival. Gone are the days of glittering red carpet movie premieres along the Great White Way. Gone and completely swept under the carpet by those allegedly in charge of preserving our cultural heritage.

Astyanax
Astyanax on August 10, 2011 at 7:03 pm

The destruction of the Roxy and the original Penn Station were indeed criminal acts!

techman707
techman707 on August 10, 2011 at 6:57 pm

Saps – It was cute.

Mike (saps)
Mike (saps) on August 10, 2011 at 6:39 pm

Didn’t anyone like my poem about the search for a photo of the Mark?

techman707
techman707 on August 10, 2011 at 6:35 pm

You can’t count the Criterion because it was butchered before it closed. The Astor Plaza and the National can’t really be counted any more than the Ziegfeld can (all opened within 5 years of each other). I still have nightmares thinking about the fact that the only theatre left that they can run premieres at in New York is the Ziegfeld….and even they’re not running much in film anymore either.

There are small cities across the country that have BETTER theatres still operating WITH FILM. All the GREAT THEATRES that we once had right here in New York have ALL BEEN allowed to be DESTROYED. That’s proof that any talk about “historical landmarks” is meaningless in New York (unless you’re Disney and want to steal some theatres). Tearing down the Roxy should have been deemed a criminal act.

Al Alvarez
Al Alvarez on August 10, 2011 at 2:54 pm

Ed, it would have to be the Criterion but I wouldn’t discount the Playpen simply because it didn’t use film. There is hardly any film used in Times Square today and the Playpen was 17 years older than the Criterion.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on August 10, 2011 at 1:58 pm

Just re-reading the opening comments… What was the last of the vintage Times Square cinemas to close? The Loew’s Astor Plaza was a relative newcomer to the area, so I wouldn’t count that. Same with the subterranean Loew’s State 4 that replaced the original Loew’s State Theatre. Was the Criterion the last of the old guard to vanish? I know the Playpen on Eigth Avenue probably outlasted ALL of the area cinemas, but I would also discount it since I doubt any actual film was projected onto that screen in the last 15 years of its existence.

techman707
techman707 on August 10, 2011 at 12:42 pm

I know Elson used the “Embassy” tag on the 46th Street Newsreel Theatre, but I wasn’t aware that the Guild 50th (on the side of Radio City) ever carried the Embassy name. When would that have been?

Al Alvarez
Al Alvarez on August 10, 2011 at 8:32 am

Techman, it was advertised as the Embassy Guild and Embassy Guild Newsreel in 1950/1951 even when showing feature films.

I think Ed is correct and Norman Elson took over the Embassy (46th St) and Guild AFTER leaving Trans-Lux.

techman707
techman707 on August 10, 2011 at 7:42 am

Al, When was the Guild 50th referred to as the “Embassy Guild”? It became the Guild when Elson took it over (I guess 1949), but, when was the Embassy name used?

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on August 10, 2011 at 7:35 am

I’ve been perusing some old articles to try and piece it together and my statement that Trans-Lux had taken over the Guild Theatre may have been based on a misunderstanding. I found at least one reference that says the theater was acquired by “Normal W Elson, president of Trans-Lux Corporation.” Seeing something like that may have lead me believe that the corporation had bought the theater, when in fact it was likely that Norman purchased the theater himslef and was merely identified by his position with Trans-Lux.

I don’t know the complete history between Trans-Lux, the Elson’s, or Guild Enterprises (or the Brandt Organization for that matter), but its probably safe to assume that Elson left Trans-Lux to form his own theater chain in 1949 and that the acquisition of the Guild was the first building block of that new enterprise.

My apologies for any confusion on that matter and I welcome further clarification from those more familiar with the historical facts. For instance, the Embassy name seems to date back to some of the earliest newsreel theaters around the city; was this an existing chain that Elson acquired when he formed Guild Enterprises, or did he acquire these theaters piecemeal?

RobertEndres
RobertEndres on August 10, 2011 at 7:16 am

Ed-Al: Thanks for the information. I didn’t know that Norman Elson had come from Trans-Lux. Now — where to the Brandts fit into Trans-Lux? I worked as a relief projectionist at the New York Experience multi-media show and was around when the South Street Seaport multi-media show opened, both operated as Trans-lux theatres under Richard Brandt. This is such an incestuous business!

Al Alvarez
Al Alvarez on August 10, 2011 at 6:59 am

I think the 50th street location switched to the Guild name when it started showing features in the late forties, early fifties, sometimes advertising as the Embassy Guild. Prior to that it was indeed the Embassy Newsreel.

techman707
techman707 on August 10, 2011 at 6:58 am

I don’t think the Guild 50th ever operated under the Embassy name (despite Peter Elson’s desire to tag everything with the name Embassy).

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on August 10, 2011 at 6:43 am

We’re talking about the Guild 50th Street, Tinseltoes, which was acquired by Trans-Lux when Norman Elson was president. I know at some point Elson left Trans-Lux to run Guild Enterprises with his son Peter, and operated a string of theaters under the Embassy banner, including the Embassy Newsreel in Times Square. I assume they acquired the Guild from Trans-Lux – we were just trying to ascertain if the Guild ever operated with the Embassy name on the marquee.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on August 9, 2011 at 12:12 pm

I think the Guild may have at one time been known as Embassy Newsreel Theatre, probably when Trans-Lux Corporation took it over in the late ‘40’s.

RobertEndres
RobertEndres on August 9, 2011 at 11:42 am

Al, Thank you. I worked both Embassy 1 and 2,3,4 (1,2,3) but didn’t realize that Embassy 1 (now a New York Visitor’s Center) had closed before the triplex. Thanks for the explanation. As I recall, the Forum or the Victoria became Embassy 5 along the way as well.