DuPage Theater

109 S. Main Street,
Lombard, IL 60148

Unfavorite 14 people favorited this theater

Showing 1,076 - 1,100 of 1,253 comments

Broan
Broan on August 3, 2005 at 4:46 pm

Give me a break, Challenger. Nobody’s going to give huge chunks of cash until they’re sure it will go into the building. Why would they? If the Friends had ownership of the building, sure. You act as though the only potential audience is those who are so dedicated that they will turn out to a rally. That’s a ludicrous assertion. And 5 stories of condos is in fact rather small. It’s clear that you won’t listen to reason.

DuPagefiends
DuPagefiends on August 3, 2005 at 4:32 pm

There you go folks. Last fundraiser was 10 months ago. Does this sound like a hard fought restoration battle? Like I said before your attitude is “why fundraise when the taxpayers could foot the bill”. Many people went to see that band (Ides of March?), NOT to save the theatre.

I don’t know what ‘propaganda’ you are talking about. Seriously.
Am I more qualified than Daniel Coffey at what?

$5.5 million in pledges…where in the bank? SHOW ME THE MONEY! That’s paper money and the Village shouldn’t gamble on paper money.

DebDynako
DebDynako on August 3, 2005 at 3:36 pm

Our last fundraiser was last October, the Light It Up concert, which was very successful. I just question why you wonder why we haven’t had a recent fundraiser…especially with a demolition order on the way? I don’t know the “Friend” you refer to either asking the taxpayers to foot the bill or the park district. It might be more of your “propaganda.” The RSC plan for restoration is fully funded without a property tax increase.

You didn’t answer my question on what makes you more qualified than Daniel P. Coffey…

BTW: We have collected $5.5 million in pledges, corporate donations and hard cash over the last few years. I’m just not sure that a guy who only wants the marquee and ticket booth to be saved can be pursuaded at this point. I’d ask that you go back to your own “demolition” site and let the preservationists have this one.

DuPagefiends
DuPagefiends on August 3, 2005 at 1:56 pm

Deb, there was a pancake breakfast back on 2000 or 2001. The pot-luck dinner netted $1000. I also bought a lemonade from your group at a cruise night.

Gala events!!! The 75th party had 195 people at it. Big Deal, the same 195 people at your rally (as you say, really 60), or at the pot-luck dinner, or who have signs. That’s what you need to get a clue about. We are a town of 44,000. There is no support except just you few. You need millions and you are collecting thousands.

Answer my question from before. When was your last fundraiser?

I also have a direct quote from another ‘friend’ who wants taxpayer $$ to pay for it. Now another ‘friend’ is attacking the park district…hmm could you guys want money from them??

I do agree with you 100% about the library referendum.

You guys had 6 years. This current plan stinks. 86 condo’s in a too small area.

My vision for saving it. Remove the marquee, ticket booth, etc. Develop the block (Library or other)only if the stuff removed is incorporated into it.

DebDynako
DebDynako on August 3, 2005 at 1:35 pm

Who’s trying to fool who, Challenger? I think you can stop using your $1,200 figure you keep spouting out. That’s the Foundation’s money—-not the Friends'. The potluck dinner you like to refer to was a mixer between our group and First Church of Lombard, a building which is also listed on the National Register of Historic Places. NEVER had a pancake breakfast. Our bigger fundraisers were gala events that raked in thousands of dollars, including our 75th anniversary at the Carlisle and the Light It Up concert with Ides of March last October. We’ve also hosted many smaller events that have raised significant funds. All the proceeds were used for the theatre.

Now, I’d like to know Challenger, what makes you more qualified than Daniel P. Coffey, who has done many significant studies on the quality of the building, who has deemed it fit for restoration, and who has done award-winning restorations on historic theatres before, to say that the restoration is unfeasable? It is your opinion, sure. But beyond that, there is no documentation to back your claims up. Of course, if there are, I’d be happy to review them with you.

As far as the business plan. You haven’t seen it. Many notable people have, and believe that this theatre will operate a balanced budget based on the figures—-and yes, including the lower seat count—-that were provided.

The DuPage Theatre will have many community uses and will showcase a steady stream of activity throughout the year. It will be affordable and convenient. And fully funded without raising property taxes. Please admit that putting a library in its place WILL RAISE PROPERTY TAXES. The other thing that you should admit is that there is NO GUARANTEE that a library referendum will pass—-we’re talking about $20 million to build a new one at that location.

Can’t we please come to an agreement about saving the DuPage Theatre? What sort of vision would you have for it, were it left standing? I’m willing to be creative and visionary—-can you?

DuPagefiends
DuPagefiends on August 3, 2005 at 6:59 am

Rita, You are wrong on so many counts:

I was in the theatre 2 years ago…took a tour. Had to leave early because the mold smell was too much. I did like the gaping hole in the ceiling and the fact that you can see sunshine through the bricks. I like how you failed to mention the safety fence around the building because bricks are falling off.

There is financial support? How much do you have in the bank..$1200 for six years work. How much have you brought in this year?

So if the business report was run for an estimated 800 or 600, how much $$ for 499 seats. Far less I would guess.

“Cost overruns are the new scare tactic” Sorry Rita, cost overruns are a reality. Nobody with a clue can argue that.

Don’t let Rita fool you. This has been going on for over 6 years, 20 if you count the other ordeals. Now it has become a joke. Like Paul posted up above “The DuPage can be saved if a few smart people get rid of old ideas and notions and use modern marketing and finance tools.” They have failed miserably at this. Instead they had pot-luck dinners and pancake breakfast’s all attended by the same 200 people. Their fundraising efforts stopped years ago. Why? Because it is easier for the taxpayers to pay for it.

melders
melders on August 2, 2005 at 11:13 pm

The city should just support the project, but offer no financial support. How hard would that be? If no money if promised, no has to be given. If the theater is not fixed, the city can demolish it. I have watched this exact thing happen in a town next to me. A man wanted to restore a theater, but the city wanted it demolished. The took the man to court so much, he had no time to restore it. No one was willing to give money to a project the city clearly didn’t want to support. It is sad this is happening here.

RestorationRita
RestorationRita on August 2, 2005 at 8:25 pm

Paul,
The DuPage Theatre which was given to Lombard by Big Idea Corporation 6 years ago is not in the kind of disrepair that “Challenger” reports. I suspect “Challenger” has not even stepped foot into the theatre since Big Idea handed over the building. Big Idea actually started renovation on the building before they determined the property was too small for their quickly growing company. They completed an estimated $1.5 million in demolition, and then “gave” the property to the Village. The theatre is ready and waiting for restoration. In fact, the Friends took great pride in caring for the building. Several clean up days were organized and proved successful in keeping the building safe from further damage. It is only now that the Friends do not have control over the building, that the fear that damage to architectural masterpieces such as the perfect condition terrazzo floor or the rare and ornate ticket booth in the promenade will get damaged due to neglect.

There is financial support, and a lot of it. But, because the Village of Lombard has repeatedly put road blocks in the way of progress, such as the current vote to demolish, public corporations as well as private citizens find it very hard to open their wallets. It is somewhat a chicken before the egg scenario. The Village wants the money before they support the project, and the support for the project needs to be there before the money comes.

A business report developed with the second Ad Hoc Committee in 2002 determined that the need for a cultural arts center is indeed needed in the area. The report estimated an annual visitor number conservatively at 86,000. The financial portion of the report was equally as positive. With the theatre dark for half of the year, and a rental fee of less than $1000 a night, the theatre would turn a profit. Because of Foundation not-for-profit status, this scenario was more than exceptable. By the way, this was based on 600 seats. The current proposal on the table originally placed close to 800 seats in the theatre, which was corrected to 500 to allow for Village parking requirements.

Cost overruns are the new scare tactic. This project is fully funded WITHOUT ANY FUNDRAISING. Fundraising would begin the day the ink dries on the contracts. It is currently estimated that there is over $5 million in donations ready to be given. The proposal also includes an overrun contingency of 12%.

Paul, the Foundation and the Friends have done EVERYTHING the Village has asked them to do. They have given them a proposal that with the proper care could bring the life back to this Main Street. All the Village needs to do is approve the project to continue to Zoning. Yet, they have stopped it once again.

rroberts
rroberts on August 2, 2005 at 8:21 pm

Paul F., Deb & Challenger:
There are no right or wrong answers. Governments do not destroy theatres; People save or let them go. If the public bands together and stops staking out individual “turfs” then the DuPage could be saved. Whoever quoted the four IFs: They are not scientific. Smaller theatres in smaller towns have been saved: Look at the Princess Theatre in Rushville, IL. They used an old business model, sold stock and did not get emotionally attached to the building. Other structures have started in far worse condition: Look at the New Amsterdam Theatre in New York. It had no roof, pigeons, vandals & rain. The DuPage can be saved if a few smart people get rid of old ideas and notions and use modern marketing and finance tools. Parking, small retail and a FEW residential units. Also a dose of common sense would help. My company offered to help create a viable business plan and a five year pro forma which included significant children’s programming. The Friends or Foundation never called us back. C'est la vie.

DuPagefiends
DuPagefiends on August 2, 2005 at 6:58 pm

Paul to answer your four “IF” points

1) The building is in such disrepair that restoring it is unfeasible.
2) The project has very little finanical support.
3) The theatre will have trouble generating bookings and the place will sit empty most of the time.
4) The theatre won’t generate enough revenue, and we have asked who or how the cost overruns will be covered and never get an answer.

TRAINPHOTOS
TRAINPHOTOS on July 31, 2005 at 12:02 pm

DebDupe,

I’m reminded of two fine examples of preservation and re-use, although they are not cinemas. The Chicago Transit Authority sold two of its “L” stations which were obsolete. The Skokie/Dempster Station was moved 100 feet east and made into a Starbucks. Yes, a Starbucks! So now people can grab their coffee before they get on the “L”! The other was the Linden Station, which was converted into a branch bank. So people could do their banking before or after they rode the “L”.

Both are fine examples of “Prairie School” archeitecture. Both met all of the “IFs” I mentioned above. Both are examples of preservation and “adatpive re-use” where it makes sense!

DuPageIsDone
DuPageIsDone on July 31, 2005 at 9:21 am

And the owner of the Tivoli and other “Classic” cinemas has passed on the opportunity of the Dupe many times it seems…if they can make a go of it with their others it only makes sense for the old DuPage to come into their fold. Gee, could there really be a reason why this theatre has been passed over?

TRAINPHOTOS
TRAINPHOTOS on July 31, 2005 at 7:43 am

By the way, I am not anti-preservation. I am very much for preservation if it is viable and if it makes sense. Even the great Chicago Theatre sits empty most of the time. Whereas the Tivoli in Downers Grove seems to have been successful (and has an owner with deep pockets).

DuPageIsDone
DuPageIsDone on July 31, 2005 at 5:25 am

So true Paul…the big “IF’s” are the downfall of this project. The building is in disrepair, private financial support is nearly non-existent, the bookings are a crap-shoot for a now only 499 seat theatre (reduced the seating to address parking issues)that is NOT going to be a movie theatre again but instead “rented” for the arts like ballet and dance recitals, live theatre, and other events. It’s not like one would have been able to pull up on Saturday to see what movie or event is playing that evening.

It is very difficult…and the supporters have tried for years. The reality of the game is that the game is over. And more condos is the fix they came up with…86 more condos literally wrapped all around the theatre from top to bottom. I for one can’t see a “luxury condo” owner all too pleased with living right above the theatre marquee!

This DuPage situation has gone on for too long. The big “IF’s” have done her in.

TRAINPHOTOS
TRAINPHOTOS on July 30, 2005 at 9:46 pm

I’ve been following the posts on the DuPage Theatre for quite some time now. I firmly believe that the comments section should be for memories, insights, corrections, etc. It amazes me how much sniping has gone on among the people posting comments on the DuPage. And that’s exactly how many restoration projects stall: bickering, the inability to agree.

I’ve never been to the DuPage, having only seen it from the outside. So I can remain neutral on the issue of the DuPage. I believe that we should be on this website because we love movies and movie theatres, new and old. We all have some favorite memory of movie theatres. Even the mall multi-plex can have a special place for us.

But, in a larger sense, we must remember that not everything can or should be saved. A theatre like the DuPage can be saved IF the following “IFs” are met:

1) IF the building isn’t in such disrepair that restoring it becomes unfeasible.
2) IF the project can gain enough finanical support, be it public, private, or some combination thereof.
3) IF the theatre, once restored, can generate enough bookings (be they concerts, plays, films) so that the place doesn’t sit empty most of the time.
4) IF the theatre can generate enough revenue from these various events that it isn’t swimming in red ink (a friend of mine, who once worked for a museum said “The funny thing about non-profits is that they still have to earn a profit!”

I’m sure I’m missing many more. But the point is that it is very difficult to run a single-screen small theatre these days. I always loved the Patio Theatre (which I lived near). But the sad reality is that that theatre has been closed since 2001 and I’ve accepted that it may never show movies again. The same is true for the DuPage. I certainly would not wish demolition on the DuPage, or any other old theare. And I certainly don’t want to see more condos. But if it can’t be renovated and placed on solid economic footing,
or put into a clever adaptive re-use (a theatre in Quincy, IL was converted into a banquet hall that was sympathetic to the building and has been a rousing success), then what is the reality here?

DuPageIsDone
DuPageIsDone on July 30, 2005 at 9:28 am

No warning? The clock was ticking for years. The village board took away the keys only after years of false starts and unfunded dreams. Then out of the blue comes this so called white knight proposal from RSC. This coming from the same group that only months before was “anti-condo” then decides to add 86 units around the theatre as it is the only salvation. Only problem is the so called new plan includes only $110,000 in so called “private” funds (pledges, not money in the bank) for the well over $8.5 million dollar project that they continually claim is fully funded. Fully funded via tax dollars when one realizes that $4 million is coming from the non-existent TIF extension, $2 million from the developer in exchange for the sale of the land and a so called donation, and tax credits and federal funds. Not one penny in private dollars to build what will become a village owned money pit. The trustees have been more than patient. One needs to take a ride down Main Street to truly appreciate what an eyesore this really is. Check out the photos at www.dupagetheatre.com
Read the enlightening discusssion and chat about all that is going on in the village’s fascinating public forum at www.lombardvillagevoice.com

DMS
DMS on July 30, 2005 at 7:14 am

Melders- They did just that. The Friends ran out of time at the end of 2004 when the deadline that had been set had passed them by – way short of the funds they had agreed to raise.

melders
melders on July 29, 2005 at 11:38 pm

I believe that this theater could be saved but the city council must support it. By supporting it, I don’t mean finacially. They must say that they are willing to coorporate with someone willing to save it. No developer will take on this project without city council support, nor can any non-profit group raise funds for restoration.

I realize that the “Freinds” group has problems. It is unfortunate that the group could not get its act together to save this theater. But the council played dirty by giving no warning about demolishion. The could have told the “Freinds” they had to have X amount of dollars in the bank by the end of this year or the theater is demolished.

melders
melders on July 29, 2005 at 11:28 pm

Hey DebDupe, seems that you have finally revealed your true feelings. In your previous postings you stated you would love to see the theater saved. Now you have changed to “Tear it down, the sooner the better”. Doesn’t seem like you want to see it saved at all!

Dave1954
Dave1954 on July 29, 2005 at 7:54 pm

This has been one of the most interesting forums on ANY theater so far!!! I liked the editorial with Daniel Coffey’s renderings in the Tribune today, and really think this thing could work. I have seen theaters in WORSE shape, particularlly the Toronto Pantages Theater, which was split into a sixplex that destroyed a good percentage of it’s interior. AND was replicated and reopened into a beauty. Of course, Toronto is NOT Lombard, and might not have enough residents who would venture out to live theater like downtown Chicago. We have so many more options for entertainment, and staying home these days seems cheaper and safer. Most venues like this thrive on a certain age bracket, usually 20-30 years of age. BUT…..keep arguing!!! Who knows? Someone might listen, and WHATEVER your views, one way or another, this will SOON draw to a close. I have to acknowledge the fact that soon Chicago will lose the Gateway Theater/Copernicus Center in the Jefferson Park neighborhood to a very tempting condo developer that’s a convenient spot just a few blocks away from the blue line and Metra. Progress SUCKS!!!

DuPagefiends
DuPagefiends on July 29, 2005 at 6:47 pm

Deb Dynako, I thought I read somewhere you have been in Lombard for ONLY 6 years, not ALL BUT 6 years. I will admit that I am wrong. Your Basic Instict story is a classic, I got quite a chuckle. You are qualified, as you stated.

However, we can agree to disagree. I am quite troubled by the claims of the ‘friends’. 5000 supporters, 1000 signs, 4500 signatures, 200 at the rally…all inaccurate numbers. That is the whole problem…inaccurate numbers. And now you want us to believe that this is fully funded? I don’t.

Plus I find your strategy of trashing the trustees quite troubling and a bad precedent to set.

By the way I saw Jaws and Star Wars (original episode IV) there. And along the lines of your story, at age 13 my friends and I tricked my mother into taking us to see Animal House. She sat a couple of rows behind us and was quite embarrassed when she discovered that there was profanity/nudity in the movie, she just assumed it was a comedy. So I too spent many a night there growing up, and our paths probably crossed….BUT I also see what condition it is in now…Horrible. I don’t need to get into the rest.

Broan
Broan on July 29, 2005 at 12:38 pm

‘DebDupe’, do you even know what an editorial is?

DuPageIsDone
DuPageIsDone on July 29, 2005 at 11:01 am

But you better get your “spin” right…cause we certainly don’t remember a balcony in the theatre as your Tribune nonsense talks of today. How they could print such garbage puts them in the leagues of that Lombard tabloid. Glad to see too that RSC has reduced the building to four stories and that all the parking is now below grade. Wow..the spin, the rhetoric, the games you people play to save this wreck of a building. Tear it down…sooner the better.

DebDynako
DebDynako on July 29, 2005 at 10:43 am

Until one is committed, there is hesitancy, the chance to draw back, always uncertainty. Concerning all acts of initiative (and creation), thre is one elementary truth, the ignorance of which kills countless ideas and splendid plans—-that the moment one definitely commits oneself, then Providence moves too. All sorts of things occur to help one that would never otherwise have occurred. A whole stream of events issues from the decision, raising in one’s favor all manner of unforeseen incidents and meetings and materials assistance, which no man could have dreamt would come his way. —-Scottish expedition, Mt. Everest

I have lived in Lombard all my life (all except 6 years spent in Chicago). My family lives here, my friends live here. I bought a home here almost 6 years ago. I am raising my children here. The first movie at the DuPage Theatre that I remember was ET because we had to wait in a line that wrapped around the building. Santa came there every Christmas. There were many other free shows for kids that my parents took me to as well. My friends and I went there almost every weekend during our high school years. It was cheap, and somewhere we could walk to where our parents knew we would be. I remember seeing the Star Wars, Nightmare on Elm Street and Purple Rain, among many others. My husband and I had our first date there—-Basic Instinct (not the best first date movie, but the smooching seats in the back row were great!) I could go on, but I hope this “qualifies” me as someone who has the right to speak out in favor of theatre restoration.

melders
melders on July 29, 2005 at 8:27 am

I wouldn’t be suprised that when this theater is destroyed the village board approves a 5 story condo building to replace it! From all the things I have heard from the people wanting to save the theater and those wanting to destroy it, it seems no one knows what is really going on. I believe that the restoration of this theater could help the downtown. Theater restorations have helped many downtowns. Marion, Il replaced there old theater after it burned down, and I believe it cost about 10 million.