Ridgewood Theatre

55-27 Myrtle Avenue,
Ridgewood, NY 11385

Unfavorite 31 people favorited this theater

Showing 801 - 825 of 2,835 comments

PeterKoch
PeterKoch on January 28, 2009 at 2:37 pm

Hi, Mpol :

Thanks for your in-depth and detailed answer to my question. Lincoln reads like a fun, safe place to grow up. So was Ridgewood, for the most part, when I grew up there. I played on its streets until called in by my parents for dinner, too.

Yes, Ridgewood, Queens NY was, and is, a very urban area, yet, to me, at least, idyllic in its own way.

MPol
MPol on January 28, 2009 at 2:34 pm

Also, Peter. K—Here’s something else I might add:

During the heyday of Urban Renewal, back in t he 1950’s and 1960’s, some of Boston’s communities were either completely bulldozed out of existence only to be replaced by not-so-attractive high-rise buildings, resulting in the displacement of hundreds, if not thousands of people, or were ghetto-ized by unscrupulous block-busting tactics. That, too, kindled my interest in communities like Ridgewood and other communities like it.

MPol
MPol on January 28, 2009 at 2:19 pm

Hi, Peter. K—

Ridgewood, Queens, and Lincoln, MA, were very, very different places to grow up. Whereas Ridgewood, (Queens), NY, seemed like a very urban area, the southern part Lincoln, MA, where I grew up, was a whole different kind of place—very wooded and idyllic, while the northern part of that town was very much like a typical suburban development—the houses smaller and much closer together. Lincoln was divided by Route 2.

Growing up in Lincoln, MA, I and afew of other kids on my street grew up playing hop-scotch, 10-20, hide-and-seek, “cowboys and indians”, “statue”, kickball, jump-rope and Chinese Jump-rope, particularly on summer days and evenings, too, until we were called in by our parents for dinner.

Often, too, we’d play on somebody’s back or front lawn, and, on snowy winter weekends and during school and holiday vacations, we’d go sledding on the street, or flying-saucering on our lawn, from morning until sunset. ice-skating, too, was a fun thing, though I was rather clumsy at it.

Bicycle riding was great, too, and swimming at a man-made pond near the Lincoln-Weston border was a popular past time, as well.

I first became interested in communities like Ridgewood (though I’d never heard of Ridgewood until I began posting here on CinemaTreasures), back in the mid to late 1970’s, when mandatory school busing took Boston by storm, and, when I began living away from home and coming in contact with all kinds of people, a number of who’d been caught up in Boston’s school busing controversy, and either were Boston public school students at the time, and/or who were parents with kids in the Boston Public School system at that time, or who’d been part of the gentrification movement. It was interesting to meet people who were caught up in that controversy, and I wanted to learn and understand as much as I could about people’s response to the controversey, and what made many of Boston’s communities tick. Doing my own research on this also helped, too. After that, although a full understanding has never been possible for me,
I went to our public schools for most of my years, and to a large suburban public high school.

PeterKoch
PeterKoch on January 28, 2009 at 7:11 am

Mpol, you’re welcome to all the Ridgewood info. I’m glad you enjoyed reading all the Ridgewood posts. Perhaps you would like to tell me sometimes about growing up in Lincoln, Mass.

What would you say is the essential difference between Lincoln, Mass. and Ridgewood and communities like it ?

How did you become interested in Ridgewood-like communities back in the ‘70’s ?

Yes, I’m a city guy transplantes to the near ‘burbs. I’m “a man of peace in a savage land” : “The Burbs” : to quote the 1989 Tom Hanks film. Haven’t seen it, though.

MPol
MPol on January 27, 2009 at 3:46 pm

You’re welcome, Peter. K. Thanks for all the info on the Ridgewood community and the Ridgewood Theatre. Communities such as the Ridgewood and other places like it throughout the United States have interested me for a long time. I first became interested in communities like that back in the mid to late 1970’s.

Btw—yes, I did enjoy my visits to NYC for screenings of West Side Story, as well as the one stage play of WSS that I saw there back around Thanksgiving of 1980, at NYC’s Lincoln Center.

You’re a transplanted city guy who moved to the ‘burbs. I did the reverse; I’m a transplanted suburbanite who moved to the city more than 30 years ago and has never wanted to look back since.
Different strokes for different folks. When I read all the postings about Ridgewood, yes, it did convey to me much of the flavor of the Ridgewood community from 50 years ago right up to the present. I enjoyed reading it all, too.

PeterKoch
PeterKoch on January 27, 2009 at 8:25 am

You’re welcome, Mpol. Thanks for the info on Lincoln, your old home town.

Back to MY old hometown (Ridgewood), and the subject at hand. I agree completely with you about the Ridgewood. I only wish there was more I could do for it.

I have posted much here on this Ridgewood Theatre page which you may enjoy reading, and which may convey to you much of the flavor of Ridegwood as a community, starting about fifty or so years ago, and continuing right on up to the present.

MPol
MPol on January 27, 2009 at 8:20 am

Thanks, Peter. K.

Yup—I do like it here a great deal. You and your wife have a friend who lives in Lincoln, MA?!?. That’s my old hometown. It was a nice, idyllic place to grow up, but after a point, it no longer held anything for me, if one gets the drift. Lincoln, MA. has changed a great deal; there are a lot of quarter, half, and one-million dollar mcmansions that’ve gone up in that town. I do have friends who still live there, but they live in a very, very old house that my friend from high school and her family lived in when she and her siblings were growing up.

Anyway, back to the subject at hand: The Ridgewood Theatre looks like a wonderful theatre. Here’s hoping they don’t destroy the interior and make it into something like a department store or whatever.

PeterKoch
PeterKoch on January 27, 2009 at 8:05 am

MPol, you wrote, “I presently reside in an artists' community in Somerville, MA., just outside Boston, and like it a lot.”

More power to you for that, MPol ! I’m happy for you ! Please keep up all your fine work.

Yes, I can well believe you’ve come to NYC (Manhattan) for screenings, and even a stage production of West Side Story. I hope you enjoyed those visits.

PeterKoch
PeterKoch on January 27, 2009 at 8:02 am

Hi, MPol. You are most welcome to the compliment.

Boston, eh ? You’re in good company with Leonard Nimoy and many others. The closest I’ve come to seeing a movie in Boston is as follows :

1) Easter break, early April 1977, took Amtrak to Boston with a friend from school to spend the holiday with him at his home in Boxford. “Yellow Submarine”, screened by Todd Glickman, who’s been on this site, was the feature film then at M.I.T., but my friend and I never went. I have, however, made contact with Todd on this site ! I don’t remember on what theater’s page, though.

Todd posted about some of the movies he remembered screening at M.I.T.

2) Next month, late May 1977, on my way to start a summer job, being trained in Waltham, some of us went into downtown Boston to see the newly debuted “Star Wars”, but I was not among them.

Currently my wife and I have a friend living in Lincoln, Mass.

Thank you again, Mpol, for your interest in Ridgewood and Bushwick movie theatres !

markp
markp on January 27, 2009 at 5:52 am

Good Morning LuisV and East Coast Rocker,
Thanks for at least hearing me out about the Ritz Theatre. Its funny how with that one and the Paradise, money spent just to sit. Now as mrbillyc points out above, the State and Count Basie, 2 theatres I happen to work at from time to time are surviving. And in the case of the State 20 years ago, people said they were crazy, no one would come. So I believe, if only the correct non-profit could be formed (or found) to run the above mentioned theatres and the Kings and this sites Ridgewood, why then palaces would be saved for ours and future generations to enjoy. We just need the right people. Thats the hardest part.

MPol
MPol on January 26, 2009 at 6:10 pm

Thanks, mrbillyc. It’s been interesting to read about how a theatre really was sort of a holding action of a community.

mrbillyc
mrbillyc on January 26, 2009 at 4:46 pm

I have enjoyed reading this conversation.
Those of us who grew up enjoying the Ridgewood and the Madison know how they both served as a focal point for the community to come together. These were places you would go to be entertained and maybe forget that all you could afford to live in was a cold water railroad flat in a nice but unglamourous area where elevated trains rumbled by people’s windows.
These were places where people who knew each other and others who did not know each other joined together to be entertained. This is something we former residents of Ridgewood have in common and why we are so nostalgic for these theaters.
In a perfect world we would not like to see the Ridgewood become another discount department store (like the Madison or the RKO Hamilton on Broadway & 146th St). It would be great to have it go the way of the State Theater in New Brunswick or the Count Basie in Red Bank NJ. These theaters survive as non profits welcoming live acts, theater and film:

http://www.statetheatrenj.org/

http://www.countbasietheatre.org/

But I am sure for every theater like these there are 10 that have had a horrible fate. Having this happen at a time when major financial institutions and even General Motors is stuggling is probably not a good omen.
Keep thinking the good thoughts and maybe, just maybe…

MPol
MPol on January 26, 2009 at 4:00 pm

I also might add, Peter. K, that our town didn’t have any movie theatre or anything like that to go to. We ended up going to movie theatres in other nearby towns and even downtown Boston to see movies.

MPol
MPol on January 26, 2009 at 3:57 pm

Hi, Peter. K. Thanks for the compliment.

I’ve lived here in the Bay State all my life. I grew up in an idyllic suburb about 20 miles due northwest of Boston as a kid, and have lived in various places in and around Boston since the mid-1970’s. I presently reside in an artists' community in Somerville, MA., just outside Boston, and like it a lot.

Believe it or not, I have, on occasion, come to NYC (Manhattan) for screenings, and even a stage production of West Side Story.

Luis Vazquez
Luis Vazquez on January 26, 2009 at 1:05 pm

ERC: That’s just nuts! I’m not doubting you, but I just can’t see someone going through the expense of renovting a theater and then just letting it sit there. I can’t comment on The Ritz but at The Paradise, the theater was stunningly restored! As beautiful as the day it opened (or so it has been stated by people who have seen it in person). Why would that owner go through that kind of meticulous restoration and then do nothing with it?

Regardless, these are isolated instances and my hope is that the public will eventually have access to these gems in the near future. The best part? They have in fact been saved! They have been restored! They have already beaten the odds.

EcRocker
EcRocker on January 26, 2009 at 12:56 pm

Luis maybe the owner of the Ritz put all that money in to it and is now sitting back and taking it off as a tax write off. Since it is not making a profit the owner takes it off as a loss. I knew of a guy that owned a vacant lot and in the summer months used it as a parking lot. He charged $10 flat rate to park. He did not have a NYC DCA license to run it so he wasn’t reporting any income and at the end of the year wrote off as a loss. Sometimes that is what owners do to deflect taxes off other properties they own that make a profit.

Luis Vazquez
Luis Vazquez on January 26, 2009 at 11:02 am

Movie534: I can’t explain the Ritz situation. Nor can I explain why the Loews Paradise in The Bronx, after a stunning milti million dollar renovation is just sitting there unused. There is an ocassional eccentric owner out there, but it also proves my point. Someone spent all that money and is still not getting any income from it! It’s crazy! Certainly, if they were trying they could book events, but would it be enough to have it be a going concern to a typical investor.

As much as I love movie palaces, if I had $25MM, would I restore the Loews Kings myself? Probably not, because I too would need to see a return on my investment. I would, however, be willing to put in some money as part of a much larger group as long as it had a proper business plan on how it would be able to operate on its own without subsidy.

Regarding the Paradise, I’m hoping that the city eventually forecloses on it for lack of paying property taxes and resells it to someone who will put it to work as a performing arts center for the entire Bronx which so richly deserves it.

Luis Vazquez
Luis Vazquez on January 26, 2009 at 10:52 am

ECR: Some of the old theaters di have great sight lines, but many did not; especially the large ones. I remember when I went on the tour of the Kings in Brooklyn I was amazed at how small the screen was relative to the size of the auditorium. That is my point. The screen seemed big if you were up close, but if you were way on the side or way in the balcony or far back in the orchestra, it was tiny.

In the multiplexes, the screen sizes in the best of them, are very large relative to the size of the theater which means you feel like you’re watching a bigger screen than you think. When you combine the more comfortable chairs and leg room and cup holder and sound etc…the new theaters have the advantage.

Even at The Ziegfeld, which is one of my favorite theaters, i like to sit no more than a third of the way from the screen in the center to get the true feeling of its big screen.

Yes, some of the old palaces have been able to replace their seating and reduce total seats but that is the exception to the rule. The sad reality is that movie palaces of yore (for the most part) cannot make it on movies alone. There are very few exceptions to this rule.

Also, I agree about the Loews Astor Plaza. It had the largest screen in New York (or at least the 2nd largest). It was a great place to see a movie. But, it couldn’t support itself with movies. The seats were ripped out and it is now a concert hall which I have yet to visit.

EcRocker
EcRocker on January 26, 2009 at 9:16 am

Luis i am going to quote you here.
“The movie going public requires seating, sight lines and screen sizes that most older theaters were unable to compete with.”

Some of and most of the older theatres had great sight lines. As far as screen sizes who are you kidding? I love watching a movie on a 25X60 foot screen. Some of these new so called multiplex movie houses have screens so small you can buy a flat screen HD TV bigger then that. As far as seats go many of the older palaces have upgraded to more comfortable seats even if it means a smaller seating capacity. When I think back to 1977 seeing Star Wars,then later on seeing Hunt for Red October and Days of Thunder at the 1440 seat Loews Astor Plaza. The sight lines were great the seats comfy and the sound system was state of the art. I tried looking it up on CT and it was not listed but a google search found that it is now the Nokia and basicaly no longer a movie theatre but a concert venue. It was still one of the best places to see a moveie.

PeterKoch
PeterKoch on January 26, 2009 at 8:54 am

If you don’t mind my asking, MPol, where DO you live, and where are you from ? Where did you grow up ? Your interest in the Ridgewood, and in other theatres in the Ridgewood-Bushwick-Maspeth area, is most welcome and appreciated.

MPol
MPol on January 26, 2009 at 8:49 am

Since I don’t live in the NY area, I don’t really have a dog in this discussion, but, knowing me, I almost always have something or other to say, anyhow.

markp
markp on January 26, 2009 at 8:47 am

As much I hate to say it LuisV, you’re right. The Kings especially is one that needs to be saved. About you’re point of people being in business to make money, how do you explain the owner of the beautifully restored Ritz Theatre in Elizabeth N.J. spending millions to renovate, then just lets it sit there and do nothing. I know of people who tried to help him get stage shows in there, and I personally worked on the projection room and offered to help get movie series and classics in there, but nothing happens. That to me is a waste of time and effort.

Luis Vazquez
Luis Vazquez on January 26, 2009 at 8:35 am

We have lost probably thousands of movie palaces over the years. The sad reality is that a great many of them could not have been saved. The were technically and functionally obsolete in today’s world. The movie going public requires seating, sight lines and screen sizes that most older theaters were unable to compete with, to say nothing of the fact that almost all of the older theaters were just too big to be economical to operate.

Having said that, every effort should be made to save those that can be reused in a manner that pays for its renovation and continued operation unless a municipal entity agrees to provide either grants for renovations or operating subsidies for its continuing operations.

It is not enough to say “oh, they should renovate it and operate it as a theater again” Who is “They?” People are in business to make money. Governments are strapped for cash. These are very dificult times. It is very gratifying to see that The Beacon Theatre in Manhattan is about to reopen after a sparkling renovation. Who paid for it?; the huge conglomerate Cablevision. How is it paying for itself? By using its stage as a concert venue. There are no current plans to show movies (though I think that would be a great idea).

I don’t see anyone stepping forward with the resources of a company like Cablevision to save the Ridgewood and if there was such a company, I would much rather they apply their money and attention to the renovation and re-opening of the Loews Kings or The Brooklyn Paramount than the Ridgewood. Brooklyn and the city would be much better served with those palaces restored. Alas, we can’t save them all. We should focus on those most worth keeping.

MPol
MPol on January 26, 2009 at 8:17 am

I see your point, movie534. The “out with the old, in with the new” attitude frequently gets taken too far, especially nowadays, and I agree that many, if not most of these grand old movie palaces could’ve/should’ve been just renovated and restored, at a lesser cost than demolition, but sometimes, just sometimes, some changes are necessary. The newer, more comfortable chairs and stadium-type seating that’s present in some of the newer theatres, for instance, are an asset, which could bring in more money as well as audiences for movies. People like to be comfortable, as well, when they watch a movie. Make ‘em feel a little bit at home!

Luis Vazquez
Luis Vazquez on January 26, 2009 at 8:08 am

Thanks Waren, I guess it’s the theatre that refuses to die!