Loew's Jersey Theatre

54 Journal Square,
Jersey City, NJ 07306

Unfavorite 98 people favorited this theater

Showing 801 - 825 of 1,509 comments

Alto
Alto on March 11, 2007 at 6:36 pm

“All About Eve” screening is being rescheduled (was originally March 23rd)…
new date and time to be determined (monitor the LJ Web site for updates).

Vito
Vito on March 2, 2007 at 7:29 am

11th COMMANDMENT

Thou shall not hold conversation
or wrinkle cellophane in a movie palace
So let it be written, so let it be done

Theaterat
Theaterat on March 1, 2007 at 6:28 am

Saps…. you are so right! I really dont care if the show starts a few minutes late. Big deal!Not everybody who comes drives in. Many are at the mercy {if this word can be used} of public transportation. The more time I spend here only gives me more time to study this magnificent theater in detail.Then again, it also gives me some more time to talk with the patrons that Im getting to know. God forbid if anybody does this during the show!That`s why the Jersey experience is unique.

Mike (saps)
Mike (saps) on February 27, 2007 at 10:18 am

Alto, you’re preaching to the choir. I guess that most people reading this website come on time.

And you can’t bring a case about what “might” happen to others — but you can if you have personally missed a bus or train connection.

Anyway, I like the late starting shows. It gives me the chance to wander around a bit, or to sit in my seat and soak up the atmosphere.

Alto
Alto on February 27, 2007 at 8:26 am

One more ongoing gripe: the LJ website needs to be updated more often (they updated it just before I wrote this). It seems that in order to get advance notice about upcoming shows, you have no choice but to go to the theater (or attempt to contact them) and find out for yourself â€" it’s as if this is some type of “insider information” reserved only for those who are able to attend events at the theater on a regular basis. This info is always mentioned in programs and flyers distributed exclusively at the shows – based on these (and the updated website), I can tell you what future films they have planned (as of the time of this writing):

March 23…Special Showing:
“All About Eve” (1950) – with live appearance by Celeste Holm

March 30-31…Film Noir:
“Double Indemnity” (1944) — “Out of the Past” (1947) — “Sunset Boulevard” (1950)

April 27-28…Timeless Romances / Fantasy Romance:
“Portrait of Jennie” (1948) — “Wuthering Heights” (1939) — “Somewhere in Time” (1980)

May 11-12…Foreign Films and Their American Remakes:
“The Seven Samurai” (1954) — “The Magnificent Seven” (1960) — other titles TBA

June…TBA

In addition, on March 18th at 4:00 PM, the Girl Scouts of Greater Essex & Hudson Counties will be hosting and presenting a special screening of “Annie: The Movie Musical” (1982).

Alto
Alto on February 27, 2007 at 8:16 am

I attended the “Casablanca” screening on Saturday (Feb. 24th) and the presentation was well done (even though the print shown was scratchy at times and had some minor dropouts). As usual, the technical crew was on top of things, and this time the audio was at what I consider to be perfect volume level â€" pronounced and easy to hear (I usually find it to be on the soft side from where I normally sit – about midway back). The FOTL volunteer staff was cordial and attentive, making everyone feel welcome. There was also a nice audience turnout, with many in attendance appearing to be newcomers (they did not seem to be “regulars” such as myself) and while that’s good, there is also a downside.

I don’t want to sound like an old crab (which I’m not), but whatever happened to punctuality and manners? An annoying trend seems to be developing as of late at this theater. For the last few shows, the show times are largely being ignored, and the movies are starting much later that they should (Saturday night’s screening started almost 25 minutes late!). I am not sure why this is, but I consider this phenomenon to be a shared fault of both theater management and the audience. I understand that this theater is in need of an audience and always goes out of its way to accommodate the public, but if patrons are so rude as to come sauntering into the theater 25 minutes after the appointed show time, then quite frankly they DESERVE to miss the beginning of the film, and its start time should NOT be delayed to accommodate the few at the expense of the majority. I arrived 10 minutes early (pin a gold star on me) and did not appreciate sitting there for over 20 minutes staring at a blank screen when I made the effort to be on time. Management’s action of starting shows late, in effect, encourages and gives tacit approval to this annoying and distracting behavior. Even after the film started 25 minutes late, patrons were STILL walking in.

Folks, you need to realize that this is NOT some garden-variety multiplex theater where they show at least 30 minutes of commercials and previews prior to the main feature (I realize that many of you INTENTIONALLY arrive late to avoid sitting through these, but you need to drop your multiplex audience mentality and break this bad habit). When a feature film is presented at Loew’s Jersey, you see nothing BUT the movie, so BE SEATED ON TIME!

I particularly say all of this out of sympathy for those patrons who rely solely on mass transit to travel to and from the theater – they are beholden to fixed schedules and time constraints and have to plan accordingly. Late starts result in late endings – the idea of missing a crucial bus or train connection late at night due to an unnecessary delay is not an appealing proposition! Placing fellow patrons in the unsavory and precarious position of having to choose whether to miss the end of a movie or miss their ride is inconsiderate and unfair!

Theaterat
Theaterat on February 20, 2007 at 8:55 am

Kind of dissapointed that GWTW is going to be the afternoon show at the Jersey, with Cassablanca the evening show.Should have been the other way! GWTW is definately a “Saturday Night” movie. I quess that kills my chances of seeing it, but I`m sure the hard core Jersey goers will post their thoughts and comments on it.

VincentParisi
VincentParisi on February 12, 2007 at 2:58 am

I’m so amazed that people liked O'Neal’s performance. I felt it really need a fine charismatic young British actor in the role and just figured Kubrick needed some star for insurance.
I still feel outside of his very good looks and slight charm O'Neal couldn’t act his way out of a paper bag. I have never seen him give a halfway decent performance. Even in What’s up Doc what wouldn’t I have given for a young Cary Grant.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on February 10, 2007 at 2:56 pm

Surely, no director fretted over such exacting standards of presentation as did Kubrick. And I agree that “Barry Lyndon” is an unsung masterpiece with O'Neal perfectly cast in the title role. What I wouldn’t give for a screening of a restored and freshly struck print of that film!

VincentParisi
VincentParisi on February 8, 2007 at 5:06 am

Robert Wise said he would get letters about the poor presentation and scratchy prints of Sound of Music. Can you believe there was a time when patrons and the director cared about such things?

Vito
Vito on February 8, 2007 at 4:30 am

Yes Peter, It comes back to me now, I was working in Hawaii
(1972-1982) I am pretty sure I played it at the Cinerama theatre. The screen size made it easy to project the film in 1.66 with properly cut plates and masking adjustments.
I wonder if the film makers take as much care and dedication to film projection these days. In the old days we would often get letters from directors asking for our help in presenting the film properly. When Dolby came along we would get fact sheets that helped to insure the EQ was correct, and with 70mm we would get a loop of pink noise so that the sound track could be callabrated properly.

William
William on February 7, 2007 at 1:33 pm

Pictures of the auditorium.

http://www.fromscripttodvd.com/70mm_in_los _angeles_pantages.htm

William
William on February 7, 2007 at 1:26 pm

When Spartacus opened at the Pantages Theatre in Hollywood. They had to drape over the front area of the auditorium and close off seats on the far left rear and far right rear of the theatre’s main floor. For the 61 weeks that it played the theatre.

VincentParisi
VincentParisi on February 7, 2007 at 11:32 am

And when Clockwork Orange opened at Cinema 1 he called and made sure they had the proper masking.

PeterApruzzese
PeterApruzzese on February 7, 2007 at 9:54 am

Yes, Vito. Kubrick made sure that the premiere engagements of Barry Lyndon were projected in 1.66 – that and various other exhibition stories are recounted in some of the biogrpahies about him.

Vito
Vito on February 7, 2007 at 9:48 am

I have a recollection of playing “Barry Lyndon” and the studio, directed by Kubrick,had new aperature plates cut and masking adjustment made for the engagement. The same thing happened when we ran “Reds”, Warren Beatty was very particular about running the film in the exact aspect ratio. Perhaps someone remembers more of this.

RobertR
RobertR on February 7, 2007 at 8:44 am

I wish they would strike a new print of Barry Lyndon, remember in the old days when a theatre like the Ziegfeld could easily have a new print and play a 2-3 week engagement of a classic?

VincentParisi
VincentParisi on February 7, 2007 at 6:35 am

Well it is a moody, atmospheric film but I found it compelling from beginning to end. Gorgeous.

But then I one of the very few people who thought Eyes Wide Shut was a great film. Probably the first new film that I went to see twice in decades. Well the public and critics will figure that out some day.

Theaterat
Theaterat on February 7, 2007 at 6:06 am

Remember seeing “Barry Lyndon” shortly after it was released. It was a beautifully photographed period piece and O`Neal was quite good.However if memory serves, I had a hard time trying to stay awake for it.

PeterApruzzese
PeterApruzzese on February 6, 2007 at 12:13 pm

Correct, no question about it, Ryan O'Neal is excellent in Barry Lyndon.

Maybe this “O'Neil” fellow you speak of is no good, but I don’t remember him in the film :)

VincentParisi
VincentParisi on February 6, 2007 at 11:10 am

O'Neil excellent in Barry Lyndon?
Chacun a son gout.
But except for the black hole in the middle of the film which I assume is Ryan I think it’s one of the great films of all time.

PeterApruzzese
PeterApruzzese on February 6, 2007 at 11:02 am

O'Neal is excellent in Barry Lyndon, which is still underrated as one of the greatest films of the 1970s. I’d love to see a new print of that one someday.

VincentParisi
VincentParisi on February 6, 2007 at 10:55 am

Well after I read that comment of Kubrick’s I figured he’d never seen Ryan O'Neil in Barry Lyndon.

Theaterat
Theaterat on February 6, 2007 at 10:48 am

Vincent… a good point and one well taken.Prehaps GWTW is racist in spots, but this was the general situation in the South during the Civil war and Reconstruction eras. As for Kubrick calling Miss Leighs peformance the worst hes ever seen? Dare I mention Tom Cruise in his own “Eyes wide shut”? Anyway, back to GWTW. I am definately going to see it. Wether the print be good, bad or indifferent. I quess I`ll take my chances and post my opinion after the show.Critics-what do they know?