Kings Theatre

1027 Flatbush Avenue,
Brooklyn, NY 11226

Unfavorite 86 people favorited this theater

Showing 751 - 775 of 1,564 comments

DanCP
DanCP on December 7, 2006 at 11:59 am

Let’s hope Marty can get some payback from Ratner for supporting his AY project in the form of a Loew’s Kings rennovation.

uncleal923
uncleal923 on December 5, 2006 at 5:46 pm

I should start getting online more often. I saw those pics and they look promising. They should reopen this beauty.

Bway
Bway on December 5, 2006 at 5:00 pm

Quote:
*A little help? I would guess at least $75 million worth to return it to something close to its original elegance. *

Perhaps, but a LOT less than it would to restore many of the other theaters in Brooklyn or Queens….that are basically gutted. At least the place is totally salvagable, unlike places like the Flushing Keiths, or perhaps the Loews Shore which are in total shambles. 75 million there probably wouldn’t even get places like that eveb a quarter restored/fixed.

Luis Vazquez
Luis Vazquez on December 5, 2006 at 3:48 am

I too believe that the time is right! These are exciting times for Brooklyn and the future is bright.

RichHamel
RichHamel on December 5, 2006 at 1:36 am

There is realistic hope for the Kings. Brooklyn has changed drastically over the last decade. Older buildings such as the former Board of Education and Williamsburg Savings Bank tower are currently being converted to luxury condos with apartments selling for over one million. A Billion+ entertainment complex is planned for Coney Island, and Brooklyn will have it’s own version of Madison Square Garden featuring the Nets. A large cultural center in the middle of Flatbush Ave is viable. The political forces appear to be for it. The time is right. I believe the Kings will be restored.

Luis Vazquez
Luis Vazquez on December 4, 2006 at 11:52 am

I was at the developer’s tour (see 10/29 posting). What’s left of the draperies are totally ruined and would need to be replaced, but this palace is totally salvagable. What is needed is an economically viable plan and the will to carry it out. The New Amsterdam on 42nd St. in Manhattan was in far worse shape with gaping holes in the ceiling, but today it stands as, arguably, the most beautiful theater in the country. Obviously, the economics of Manhattan are far different than Brooklyn, but that is what the city’s economic development authority is trying to resolve. How can they make it work? I pray that they find the answer.

Bway
Bway on December 4, 2006 at 6:33 am

I thought that was too good to be true! But I do see the draperies in the current photo too, but am sure they need to be replaced. The place still looks elegant, even if needs a little help.

Bway
Bway on December 4, 2006 at 6:33 am

I thought that was too good to be true! But I do see the draperies in the current photo too, but am sure they need to be replaced. The place still looks elegant, even if needs a little help.

JimRankin
JimRankin on December 4, 2006 at 2:28 am

That last photo of Warren’s is from page 94 of the 1980 book “Movie Palaces, Survivors Of An Elegant Era” by Ave Pildas. It is doubtful that the draperies have survived as seen there in the intervening 26 years, sad to say. But ‘Bway’ is right; the place is restorable.

Bway
Bway on December 3, 2006 at 5:06 pm

Wow, that’s a current photo? It shows how beautiful the building still really is, and a diamond in the rough, just waiting for a little help. Thankfully, the place is completely restorable (expensive, but thankfully totally possible), unlike so many other gems throughout the city….

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on December 2, 2006 at 6:56 am

Thanks, Warren. I forgot about the Loew’s connection to the Capitol and the Metropolitan completely escaped my mind. Architectural splendor aside, the Kings would have been too remote from the downtown hub (and Brooklyn’s own “theater district”) to have been considered a true flagship for the borough.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on December 1, 2006 at 6:08 pm

Math was not my great subject… obviously the discrepancy is 400 seats in the Times' count, not 500.

Ed Solero
Ed Solero on December 1, 2006 at 6:07 pm

Somewhere along the way, the Times picked up an extra 500 seats in its count for the Kings. While the ‘88 article reasonably rounds up the total to 3200, the article from last Sunday’s paper gives that number at 3600. Also… while this was obviously a significant jewel in the Loew’s crown – and no doubt their premiere house in Brooklyn – wouldn’t the Loew’s State in Times Square have been considered the chain’s flagship?

Life's Too Short
Life's Too Short on December 1, 2006 at 8:02 am

I never realized there was a large rotunda at the head of the lobby. I always thought the entire lobby consisted of the area at back, enclosing the staircase. The lobby is HUGE!

Luis Vazquez
Luis Vazquez on November 28, 2006 at 4:22 am

The potential deveoper picture in the Times showed only a few people. I was at the tour in mid October and there were between 50 and 100 people present.

Bway
Bway on November 27, 2006 at 3:32 am

Wow, great article and photo!

Life's Too Short
Life's Too Short on November 26, 2006 at 8:36 am

That is a great photograph. Take a look while you can.

Here is hoping there is a happy ending on Flatbush Avenue!

DavidWallick
DavidWallick on November 26, 2006 at 6:11 am

A great article on the Loew’s Kings appears in the New York Times of November 26, 2006. The link for it is below. FYI, links from the Times only work for a short period of time unless you are a member of their Time Select program.
View link

uncleal923
uncleal923 on November 8, 2006 at 6:10 pm

Is there any way one can buy the video on the Wonder Theaters?

RobertR
RobertR on November 5, 2006 at 4:20 pm

“Fanny Hill” was another one of those porno chic movies that played on wide release. Look at the size of this showcase.
View link

Theaterat
Theaterat on November 2, 2006 at 5:20 am

The same we feel about people chattering away and text messaging on those obnoxious cell phones!

Bway
Bway on November 2, 2006 at 4:33 am

Please guys, can we return to the movie being shown in the Kings? You know how people feel about people talking during movies….

mikemorano
mikemorano on November 2, 2006 at 3:28 am

Well fella posting duplicate messages is not contributing. It is called cluttering. Your repeat comments are the same annoyance to other’s as is the ‘usual off-topic gibberish’ that you complain about other’s doing. It appears to me that your troublemaking ways surface when you run out of legitimate comments to make. If you have nothing interesting to say then say nothing.

Michael Furlinger
Michael Furlinger on November 1, 2006 at 2:59 pm

i will believe it when i see it …………

mikemorano
mikemorano on November 1, 2006 at 1:10 pm

The Loew’s Kings video is the same one posted by Dan in PLG on Sep 29, 2006 at 4:52pm. It is also the same video in a downloadable form posted by Dan in PLG on Oct 1, 2006 at 8:49am. Getting desperate for comments fella.