Loew's Jersey Theatre

54 Journal Square,
Jersey City, NJ 07306

Unfavorite 98 people favorited this theater

Showing 651 - 675 of 1,509 comments

HowardBHaas
HowardBHaas on April 7, 2008 at 11:19 pm

does anybody know where the “Planet of the Apes” print is from? people stated there were faults with the new print recently shown at the Ziegfeld.

Alto
Alto on April 7, 2008 at 10:42 pm

Correction regarding above post (show times TBA):
May 9th: “A Clockwork Orange” (1971)
May 10th: “Blade Runner: The Final Cut” (2007 [1982])

CLASSIC COMEDY WEEKEND exact days and times…
Fri. April 25th
8 p.m.: Marx Bros. in “Duck Soup” (1933) plus two Three Stooges shorts!
Sat. April 26th
4 p.m.: Laurel & Hardy in “Our Relations” (1936) plus one Three Stooges short!
8 p.m.: W.C. Fields double feature: “Never Give a Sucker an Even Break” (1941) —
“The Bank Dick” (1940 – Universal’s only surviving 35 mm print of this movie will be shown).

Alto
Alto on April 2, 2008 at 10:33 pm

Friday night’s “Princess Bride” had a pretty good-sized crowd for a Friday night.

Surprisingly decent turnout (about 200) for “The Red Balloon”/“White Mane” double feature (considering that it was an early afternoon screening and all foreign films) – lots of families with children.

The screenings of “Beauty and the Beast” and “The Hunchback of Notre Dame” were not as fortunate, with smaller crowds (more adult-less family audiences) â€" not what I would have expected for Saturday night screenings. Coincidentally, on the following evening, I went to a bar in the West Village where they often show classic movies in the background on video monitors â€" when I looked up at one of the screens, there was the same version of “Beauty and the Beast” playing!

I’m sure this season’s remaining film weekends will draw bigger crowds – there’s something for everybody.

April 25-26th: “Classic Comedy” series…
Including: “Duck Soup” (Marx Bros.) and “The Bank Dick” (W.C. Fields)

May 25th: “Clockwork Orange”
May 26th: “Blade Runner: Final Cut”

June 13-14th: “Going Ape” series…
Featuring: “Planet of the Apes” -â€" “Mighty Joe Young” -â€" “King Kong” (1933)

Specific days and times to be announced soon.

Let’s not forget…more Bette Davis with the special Saturday, April 12th, 7:30 p.m. screening of “All About Eve”, featuring a live guest appearance by actress Celeste Holm.

pjacyk
pjacyk on March 31, 2008 at 4:34 am

Here is a really terrific picture of the Loew’s Jersey lobby all done up for an event. View link

How did the movies turn out this weekend? Sounded like lots of good films. The Red Balloon is always fun.

KingBiscuits
KingBiscuits on March 6, 2008 at 10:18 pm

This theatre appeated in the recent little-seen Queen Latifah/Terrence Howard film “The Perfect Holiday”.

Bill Huelbig
Bill Huelbig on March 3, 2008 at 5:41 pm

Frankie’s right – the “Baby Jane” show was so much fun. It was a full circle show for me because I saw it across the street at the Stanley 46 years ago, when it broke all Jersey City attendance records. My dad was shocked that all tickets were $2 each (including children, who were usually 50 cents) for this special engagement only:

View link

I forgot about the Blue Ribbon, but I had some excellent hot dogs at Boulevard Drinks.

frankie
frankie on March 3, 2008 at 4:22 pm

Who says you can’t go home again ? Moviegoers will still fill a movie palace when Bette Davis is playing ! Although the first 2 films were well attended, there was a large, devoted , varied crowd for “Baby Jane” ! It was a real celebratory event ! Bravo AGAIN, Loew’s Jersey !!! May I also rave about the Blue Ribbon restaurant behind the PATH train ? Best filet of sole I’ve ever had ! Celeste, we’re COMING !!!

Alto
Alto on February 17, 2008 at 8:24 pm

Bonus: The “Wonder Morton” organ will be put through its paces during the “Bette Davis weekend”, playing pre-show “entrance music”, as movie-goers enter the auditorium before each screening.


More upcoming classic film events…

March 28th & 29th (Fri. & Sat.): FRENCH AND FANTASY

“La Belle et la bête” (“Beauty and the Beast” – French, 1946)
“Le Ballon Rouge” (“The Red Balloon” – French, 1956) & “Crin Blanc” (“White Mane” – French, 1953)
“The Princess Bride” (USA, 1987)


April 12th (Sat. evening): Special Screening of “ALL ABOUT EVE” (1950)
Featuring a live guest appearance by film star Celeste Holm!
(Rescheduled from its original date of March 23rd, 2007.)

Alto
Alto on February 6, 2008 at 11:35 pm

Coming soon!

CENTENNIAL TRIBUTE TO BETTE DAVIS – the diva at her best…

Fri. Feb. 29th and Sat. Mar. 1st:
“Jezebel” — “Now, Voyager” — “Whatever Happened to Baby Jane?”


SPECIAL FILM EVENT – by popular demand, on the HUGE Loew’s screen where it belongs…

The evening of Sat. May 10th:
“Blade Runner: Final Cut” (a 25th Anniversary special edition)

The ulitmate version of this cult sci-fi classic is FINALLY here!

gabedellafave
gabedellafave on February 4, 2008 at 3:38 am

Totally agree. That is a wonderful restaurant. Lots of atmosphere there and the food is good too. I also highly recommend it. I’ve been going there for years—since it was the Summit House. I like how you used Google Maps to show where the restaurants are located around “The Square.” When I was a kid we used go to White Castle, but that was another time in my life. Newark Ave. is getting to be a fun place these days! Lots of nice street activity and very interesting stores and restaurants.

The easiest way to get to the Blue Ribbon from the Loew’s on foot is through the PATH Center. Just go downstairs to the concourse and walk straight on through to Magnolia Ave. Follow Magnolia one short block to Summit Ave. and the Blue Ribbon is right there, directly across the street.

plenum
plenum on February 3, 2008 at 3:25 am

I realize that this post is a bit off topic for Cinema Treasures but it is appropriate for attendees of events at the Loew’s Jersey.

If you are to visit the Loew’s Jersey for a movie or event, I strongly suggest that you visit “The Blue Ribbon” restaurant. It can be found on the map on the Dining page of www.loewsjersey.org

The restaurant is located within the oldest existing structure in Jersey City and offers a wonderful atmosphere (exposed wooden beams, working fireplace, etc), a friendly staff and a great menu of American favorites with a full bar.

I think it is the perfect combination for a Loew’s Jersey experience – a delightful pre or post show meal in a historic building and a great film in a classic movie palace.

What could be better?

gabedellafave
gabedellafave on February 1, 2008 at 12:24 am

New York Paramount and the Loew’s Jersey — a very short comparison (since the two theatres were built by the same architects and are about the same size):

Marquee:

View link
http://www.leonardmaltin.com/LoewsJersey.jpg

Organ console:

http://lostprovince.com/PTOS/CentII.jpg (NY Paramount)
View link

Auditorium:

View link
View link

gabedellafave
gabedellafave on January 31, 2008 at 10:32 pm

Bob, there are two sides of the coin to this great theatre being in NJ. One is that it is in the relative “boonies.” OK, that’s a problem. Perhaps things will get better as Journal Square develops into an upper-middle class residential area. The other side of the coin is that if this theatre had been in say Times Square, it would in all likelihood no longer exist. The Times Square Paramount was very similar to the Loew’s Jersey. It was by the same architectural firm, and the auditoriums were nearly identical. Also, the organs consoles in both theatres were nearly identical. Both theatres had that French curved front entrance. THE Paramount has been gone for 40+ years now. The Loew’s is still with us. Adrian and Luis are both correct. We should be grateful for what is left and “do what we can, wherever we can.”

Luis Vazquez
Luis Vazquez on January 31, 2008 at 7:47 pm

To GabeDF…I grew up with The Valencia so I too know what its like to have an emotional favorite. The reality is that all FIVE of these theaters make up an incredible collection of theater architecture and history and should be left to subsequent generations as an example of a way of life that no longer exists. For 4 out of the 5 Wonder Theaters, I think that will happen. I believe the futures of The Jersey, the 175th Street, The Valencia and The Paradise are assured. Like you, my overriding concern is the Kings. We’ve lost so many grand theaters of the past; The Roxy, the Capitol, The Flushing RKO Keiths, The Brooklyn Fox, Loews Pitkin, I could go on and on. It is very important that we keep what is left.

I’ve been following the saga of The Boyd theater in Philadelphia with dismay at how close that city is to losing its one remaining movie palace. This is the only one left in the 6th? largest city in the country! What a shame. While we in New York complain a lot about our losses, the reality is that we still have an enviable amount of theaters remaining. Besides the Wonder Theaters we have Radio City, The Hollywood, The New Amsterdam, The Beacon, The St. George. Others are now fully restored houses of worship like The Hollywood in Times Square, The Metropolitan in Brooklyn, The Elmwood in Queens and of course, The Stanley in Jersey City. Still others are tantalizing in the possiblities of restoration like the Brooklyn Paramount and The Richmond Hill RKO Keiths. There are still many others around the city.

It doesn’t mean that we should be complacent. We should continue to press to save and keep as many of these theaters as we can But we shouldn’t lose sight that in New York (and Jersey City) we’re fortunate to have as many as we do still standing and still in use.

schmadrian
schmadrian on January 31, 2008 at 6:58 pm

I’m going to resist my usual diatribing and instead simply mention that this week, I’ve been trawling the CT pages and am constantly stunned by how much has been lost. In just about every major city in North America. (I’m constantly amazed that my ‘home town’…population when I was growing up of less than 250,000…had TWO Thomas Lamb cinemas a block apart. Both now gone.) My point here is that while we see these ‘palaces’ in a particular light, others, many others, MOST others, don’t.

We live in a world of diminishing appreciation of our heritage. More value is placed on ‘new’ than ‘old’. (This goes for people as well as buildings.) Much can be said about how this reflects ‘modern’ values. And yet we began knocking down many of these gems forty, fifty, sixty years ago. So it’s not a new development, this disregard, this disrespect.

If our own neighbours don’t put any value on these nostalgic gems, these cathedrals of film, if they can’t be bothered to want to reclaim, refurbish and restore, why would you expect someone from thousands of miles away to? The skewed perception of ‘Hollywood’s role’ aside (and subsequent naive railings at the same), I suppose we just have to do what we can, wherever we can.

Rory
Rory on January 31, 2008 at 6:57 pm

Gabe, I’m very cynical about “Hollywood,” old or new. In the words of Vincent Price, “It was an evil place.” Yes, I agree with you it would be nice if the “Studios” would maintain the surviving Movie Palaces as something like museums and show fully restored, pristine prints of their old movies all the time. It would be wonderful, FABULOUS!!! But it ain’t gonna happen. And as for “Money is not God”… Oh, just call me Mr. Cynical.

gabedellafave
gabedellafave on January 31, 2008 at 6:43 pm

To LuisV: You are entitled to your own tastes and opinions. I’m glad that you think so highly of the 5 Wonder Theatres. We are in total agreement on that count. I would place the King’s as a very close 2nd to the Jersey, but that’s just my opinion. I’m not unbiased. H grew up with the Loew’s Jersey. It was my neighborhood movie house. The lobby of the King’s is without question one of the most beautiful in the country (restored or not). Next to the Loew’s Jersey, the King’s is my biggest concern. I hope it can be saved and fully restored. It should be.

gabedellafave
gabedellafave on January 31, 2008 at 6:30 pm

Isn’t this thread about the Loew’s Jersey (and more broadly about movie palaces), Rory? I am strictly speaking of theatres that were built to show movies, and not converted vaudeville houses. The Loew’s Jersey Theatre was created specifically to show movies, with the 2nd purpose being vaudeville. The old Roxy Theatre in New York was also created to show movies, as were Broadway’s Rivoli and Rialto. If you should go to the Loew’s Jersey, you would see that this is obvious. Radio City is not strictly speaking a movie palace because it was created for a grander form of vaudeville. Similarly, the State Theatre (Jersey City) was not a movie palace, because it was a converted vaudeville house.

The Loew’s Jersey was/IS a MOVIE palace. Loew’s was a theatre chain that created/bought MGM to fill its theatres with “product.” After 1935, and while Loew’s still owned the Jersey Theatre, vaudeville was dead. So from 1935 to 1948 the parent company Loew’s showed their subsidiary company’s (MGM) movies in their movie theatres. So in this case, the theatre was intimately tied in with the studio.

Of course that’s in the past, and modern Hollywood has little to do with the old theatres, if anything. Yet modern Hollywood is more than happy to ride on the coat tails of old Hollywood, aren’t they? Don’t you think they owe old Hollywood something for that goodwill? Modern Hollywood (collectively, and even if they are just sub’s of major corporations) OWES old Hollywood and its theatres something. New Yorkers believed that the New York Central R.R. owed Grand Central Terminal something. The railroad wanted to tear it down and make a real estate killing. The battle went all the way to the Supreme Court. New Yorkers won, and Grand Central is still there. As it turns out, NY State actually restored the structure. So perhaps it will take government intervention to restore the best of the old movie palaces. If NJ were only more like Ohio in that regard. Have you ever seen the (Loew’s) Ohio Theatre in Columbus?! What a job the state did on that old theatre. Why can’t that be done in NJ?

Perhaps in 100 years, modern Hollywood will be defunct (thanks in no small part to its blown up video game comic book movies) and the existing movie palaces will still be here beautifully restored. They were certainly built to last forever. Call my views naive, tradition bound, or “European,” but these ideas are my opinions. Money is not God. People need culture too.

Luis Vazquez
Luis Vazquez on January 31, 2008 at 6:06 pm

I have to respectfully disagree with GabeF regarding the Jersey. While I do believe that it is a spectacular theater that should be fully restored, I believe all four of the other Wonder Theaters were even better. I would even throw in The Hollywood Theater in Times Square.

The Paradise, which is fully restored is astonishing. The 175th Street theater, which you think is gimmicky, is one of the best fusion style theaters remaining in the world and it too is fully restored. The Valencia, while grotesquely repainted to reflect its current use as a church is also a more beautiful theater than the Jersey. Finally, I believe The Kings (which I had to opportunity to view on a tour last year) would outshine all of the others if it were restored to it former opulence. Even in its decayed state, it is jaw droppingly beautiful. The Hollywood, by the way, is awe inspiring in its glamour restoration by the church.

Again, no disrespect to the Jersey is intended. The Loew’s Wonder Theaters have to be the finest quintet ever constructed as a group by one company. But, if I had to rank them, I would place the Jersey last.

Rory
Rory on January 31, 2008 at 5:24 pm

The movie studios, to my knowledge, didn’t create whatever surviving movie palaces there are. The vast majority of what where called “Movie Palaces” were old Vaudeville houses that were merely converted to movie theatres. Another thing that has to be remember is that the modern “studios” aren’t the same companies they were in the past. Mostly they’re now just logos that larger multi-national corporations now use to distribute motion pictures. 20th Century-Fox, for instance, has been sold and resold so many times that not only isn’t it the same corporation it was in the thirties and forties, it isn’t even the same company it was in the sixties and seventies! The modern incarnations of the film studios don’t feel they owe a thing to the past, believe me — they’d laugh you off whatever “lots” they got left, and in fact are only interested in preserving and restoring their old library titles because they, thankfully, still think there’s a buck in it. Get real! ; )

gabedellafave
gabedellafave on January 31, 2008 at 4:54 pm

To Rory: Yes, the “corporate subsidiaries” that are “the studios” have a duty to preserve their history, including the breath-taking theatres that they created from about 1920 to 1933 (or so). Look at what Ted Turner did to save many of the old movies! TCM is a literal television museum of old movies and obviously it doesn’t make a red cent for Turner or his companies. He did it because he recognizes his duty to preserve our heritage. The Dolan family of Cablevision restored Radio City. Why? To make money? I don’t think so. If the studios won’t step up to the plate of saving their history, the government should step in and save them. The Paris Opera and La Scala don’t turn a profit, but there they are. Can’t we in America have at least one grand movie palace whose main purpose is to show movies (which, btw, are our greatest artistic contribution to the world)? Is that too much to ask? Well, the English had to make “Chaplin” so perhaps England and France will step in and save a couple of our movie palaces. One of them would certainly be the Loew’s Jersey Theatre.

gabedellafave
gabedellafave on January 31, 2008 at 4:45 pm

The new site is wonderful! I think you are doing a great job of combining the best of the old site with the updated elements and pages. The main page really grabbed my attention and it is faithful to the atmosphere of the theatre. I also like the Quicktime VR view. Perhaps you could do one of the auditorium as well, and perhaps the auditorium from the stage? Just a thought. All in all, the new web site is a very nice improvement!

BTW, I’m so glad you included that video of the interior. People should see this theatre in motion, so that they can get a spacial sense of the place.

plenum
plenum on January 31, 2008 at 4:36 am

GabeDF,

Thanks again for mentioning that video – I have gone ahead and incorporated it into the www.loewsjersey.org website.

Susan S., another volunteer, and I worked hard over the Christmas holiday to launch the new site.
Have you had a chance to explore it?

Rory
Rory on January 31, 2008 at 3:46 am

Hollywood has a duty?!!! I guess you mean the modern corporate subsidiaries euphemistically know as “the studios.” Hell, it’s taken decades for them to wake up to caring about the film and sound elements in their vaults. Now you think they should also care about some old buildings scattered across the country? Sir, these are souless, bottom-line, don’t-do-nothin'-unless-they-smell-a-huge-profit creatures who probably won’t give you the correct time!

gabedellafave
gabedellafave on January 31, 2008 at 3:39 am

This is not my video, but I highly recommend it if you’re curious to see what all the fuss is about. The best thing about this video is that it gives an excellent idea of the lobby of the theatre (a tour really), and you do get a peek (a dark one) of the auditorium as well. Also, you do get to see the real movie screen as it begins to show “Miracle on 34th Street.” Again, this is well worth watching:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VA2ArQFb38

When we talk about the Loew’s Jersey, we are not talking “small change.” This is one of the grandest movie palaces still standing; and it is largely (99 percent) unchanged from it’s 1929 opening.